High Versus Low Power Settings During Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy

ConditionRenal Stone
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorHaukeland University Hospital

About this trial

The primary aim of the study is to compare the operative times following ureteroscopic lithotripsy for renal stones with Thulium Fiber Laser using low and high power settings.

Secondary aims are to compare the results of low and high power settings in terms of stone free rates, laser time, laser activation patterns, intraoperative and postoperative complications.

Patients ≥ 18 years with renal stones (8-25 mm) scheduled for ureteroscopic lithotripsy at the Day Surgery Clinic at Haukeland University Hospital in Bergen, Norway, are eligible for inclusion in the study. After written consent and inclusion, patients are randomised to laser lithotripsy using either low power settings (Group 1: 4-6 Watt, short pulse mode) or high power settings (Group 2: 16-18 Watt, short pulse mode). The ureteroscopic procedures are performed in general anaesthesia using a standardised technique. All patients are followed up with a low dose CT scan 3 months post endoscopically to assess stone free status as well as a consultation at the outpatient clinic.

Results and data for the two randomisation groups are compared according to the aims of the study.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients ≥ 18 years scheduled for URS lithotripsy for renal stones, 8-25 mm, at the day surgery unit at Haukeland University Hospital

Disqualifiers

Concomitant ureteral stone

Urinary diversion

Active infection

Untreated cancer in the upper urinary tract

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Laser power settings (Thulium Fiber Laser)

    Other intervention

    Ureteroscopic lithotripsy using low power laser settings (0.4 - 0.6 J at 10 Hz corresponding to 2.4 - 6.0 Watts) or high power laser settings (0.4 J at 40 Hz, 0.6 J at 30 Hz or 0.8 J at 20 Hz corresponding to 16 - 18 Watts).

Treatment groups

150 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Group 1 - low power laser settingsExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Group 2 - high power laser settingsExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Operative time

Surgical time in minutes, counted from start of the procedure with insertion of the cystoscope until emptying the bladder in the end.

Time frame
During surgery (approximately 1 hour), registered immediately after surgery

Secondary outcomes

1

Stone free rate

Assessment of stone free status (or the presence of residual fragments) on low dose CT 3 months post endoscopically.

Time frame
3 months post endoscopically
2

Laser activation patterns - duration

Duration of laser activation periods during laser lithotripsy in seconds

Time frame
During surgery (approximately 1 hour), registered immediately after surgery
3

Laser activation patterns - number

Number of laser activation periods during laser lithotripsy

Time frame
During surgery (approximately 1 hour), registered immediately after surgery
4

Intraoperative complications

Complications occurred during the endoscopic procedure (bleeding, perforation, avulsion, mucosal abrasion, blurred vision)

Time frame
During surgery (approximately 1 hour), registered immediately after surgery

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.