IBS-Oriented CDED Versus Low FODMAP Diet for Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorAriel University

About this trial

Background: Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) affects approximately 4.1% of the global population and imposes a significant personal and healthcare burden. Recent evidence highlights the role of low-grade inflammation, impaired intestinal permeability and gut microbiota dysbiosis in the pathophysiology of non-constipated IBS (IBS with predominate diarrhea; IBS-D and mixed type IBS; IBS-M). Most patients report food-related symptom exacerbation, making dietary intervention a cornerstone of treatment. While the low-FODMAP diet (LFD) is widely used to reduce fermentable carbohydrates and alleviate symptoms, it may negatively affect microbial diversity and lacks anti-inflammatory effects. In contrast, the Crohn's Disease Exclusion Diet (CDED), developed for Crohn's disease, has demonstrated the ability to reduce intestinal inflammation, improve barrier function, and promote a favorable microbiota profile. These mechanisms may be relevant and beneficial in IBS, but have yet to be studied in this population.

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of a modified CDED to the LFD for the treatment of non-constipated IBS symptoms, Hypothesis: A modified CDED will be at least as effective as the LFD in alleviating non-constipation IBS symptoms, stool consistency, quality of life, and psychological distress, while demonstrating superior effects on markers of low-grade inflammation, gut microbiota composition, and intestinal permeability.

Methods: This is a single-center, open-label, randomized study to be conducted at the Gastroenterology Department of Sheba Medical Center. 136 adults diagnosed with Rome IV-defined IBS-D or IBS-M and an IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS) ≥175 will be randomized 1:1 to receive either a modified CDED or the LFD for 6 weeks. Accounting for a 10% dropout rate, the total sample size will be 150.

Following a 14-day screening period, eligible participants will undergo data collection at baseline, week 3 and week 6. Visit 1 (screening) will be conducted on-site; visits 2-4 will be remote. Participants will complete daily symptom diaries \[Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) and GI Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)\], and weekly IBS-SSS. Validated questionnaires assessing psychological distress, somatization, extraintestinal symptoms, and quality of life will be administered at each time point.

Stool samples will be collected at baseline, week 3, and week 6. Fecal calprotectin (FC) and α1-Antitrypsin (A1AT) will be analyzed as markers of intestinal inflammation and permeability. Microbiota analysis will be conducted using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, with evaluation of microbial diversity, taxonomic shifts, and associations with clinical and biological outcomes.

Significance: This is the first study to evaluate the modified CDED as a dietary intervention for the treatment of IBS. It may offer a novel, inflammation-targeted alternative treatment for IBS.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Adults, men, and women (≥18 years) are diagnosed with IBS-D or IBS-M according to Rome IV criteria.

Moderate-to-severe symptoms (IBS-SSS score ≥175).

Stable use of any IBS-related medications for ≥6 weeks before study enrollment, except for antibiotics

Disqualifiers

Coexisting GI diseases [e.g., Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, SIBO, celiac disease [positive transglutaminase (TTG) serology].

Disease that could explain or influence symptoms or GI function, including diabetes, thyroid disease [abnormal Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone (TSH)], and bariatric surgery.

Recent intestinal resection.

Pregnancy or breastfeeding.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Modified Crohn's Disease Exclusion Diet (CDED)

    Other intervention

    Participants will follow a modified Crohn's Disease Exclusion Diet (CDED) adapted for patients with irritable bowel syndrome. The intervention excludes the enteral formula used in the original CDED protocol and is delivered for 6 weeks with individualized dietary counseling.

  • Low FODMAP Diet

    Other intervention

    Participants will follow a standard low FODMAP diet for 6 weeks with individualized dietary counseling.

Treatment groups

150 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Modified Crohn's Disease Exclusion Diet (CDED)Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Low FODMAP DietActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Proportion of participants achieving a clinically meaningful response (≥50-point reduction in IBS Symptom Severity Score [IBS-SSS])

The primary efficacy outcome is the proportion of participants achieving a clinically meaningful response, defined as a reduction of at least 50 points from baseline in the IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS) after 6 weeks of treatment. The IBS-SSS is a validated questionnaire ranging from 0 to 500, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.

Time frame
Baseline and Week 6

Secondary outcomes

1

Proportion of participants achieving a ≥100-point reduction in IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS)

Proportion of participants achieving a reduction of at least 100 points from baseline in the IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS) after 6 weeks of treatment.

Time frame
Baseline and Week 6
2

Proportion of participants achieving a ≥50% reduction in IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS)

Proportion of participants achieving a reduction of at least 50% from baseline in the IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS) after 6 weeks of treatment.

Time frame
Baseline and Week 6
3

Change from baseline in IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS)

Absolute and percentage change from baseline in the IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS). Scores range from 0 to 500, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.

Time frame
Baseline, Week 3, and Week 6
4

Change from baseline in gastrointestinal symptom severity (Visual Analog Scale)

Absolute and percentage change from baseline in gastrointestinal symptom severity assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.

Time frame
Baseline, Week 3, and Week 6

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Ariel University

Lead sponsor

Sheba Medical Center

Collaborator

Ministry of Innovation, Science and Technology of Israel

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: