Imaging Treat-to-target Strategy vs Conventional Treat-to-target Strategy in Psoriatic Arthritis

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorDiakonhjemmet Hospital

About this trial

The main objective is to assess if a treat-to-target strategy implementing structured imaging assessments leads to better patient outcome in terms of sustained remission compared to a conventional treat-to-target strategy in psoriatic arthritis.

Main inclusion criteria are: \>18 years of age, Clinical diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), Fulfillment of ClASsification of Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria, Indication for treatment with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs according to treating physician

Primary endpoint: Sustained remission, defined as Very Low Disease Activity (VLDA) at 16, 20 and 24 months

Secondary endpoints: Individual and composite disease activity measures and remission criteria, inflammation assessed by ultrasound, health related quality of life and adverse events.

Study design: A two-arm, parallel-group, single-blind, treatment strategy study where patients are randomized 1:1 to a conventional treat-to-target follow-up strategy with structured clinical assessment of disease activity or an imaging informed treat-to-target follow-up strategy with both structured clinical assessment of disease activity and structured imaging assessment of disease activity. Duration of follow-up is 24 months.

All patients are treated according to an algorithm based on current European recommendations. The conventional treatment target, applicable to both arms and the sole target in the conventional arm, is all of: Disease Activity index in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) remission (≤3), Enthesitis ≤1, Psoriasis Body Surface Area ≤3%

Intervention: A treat-to-target treatment strategy incorporating information from ultrasound assessment of joints, tendons and entheses (at every visit), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of spine and sacroiliac (SI)-joints at baseline and 1 year, in addition to clinical information. Specifically, this means that these additional measures will be added to conventional treat to target:

* If evidence of enthesitis or axial inflammation on imaging the patient will progress directly to biological disease modifying antirheumatic drug in the treatment algorithm * If evidence of ongoing inflammation (power Doppler\>0) on ultrasound assessment of joints, tendons or enthesis, the patient will be classified as not having reached their treatment target

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Adult (>18 years of age)

Clinical diagnosis of PsA

Indication for treatment with DMARDs according to treating physician (including having attempted ≥2 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for a minimum of 4 weeks in total in predominantly axial and/or entheseal disease)

Fulfillment of CASPAR criteria for PsA

Disqualifiers

Verified arthritis >1 year prior to inclusion

Previous DMARD treatment for PsA

Systemic glucocorticoid use within the last 3 months

Local glucocorticoid injections within the last 4 weeks

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Imaging informed treat-to-target

    Other intervention

    A treat-to-target treatment strategy incorporating information from ultrasound assessment of joints, tendons and entheses (at every visit), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of spine and sacroiliac (SI)-joints at baseline and 1 year, in addition to clinical information Specifically, this means that these additional measures will be added to conventional treat to target: * If evidence of enthesitis (power Doppler\>0 in enthesis) or axial inflammation (SPARCC score ≥ 2\* in SI-joint or SPARCC score ≥ 5 in presence of clinical symptoms of axial disease) on imaging the patient will progress directly to biological disease modifying antirheumatic drug in the treatment algorithm * If evidence of ongoing inflammation (power Doppler\>0) on ultrasound assessment of joints, tendons or enthesis, the patient will be classified as not having reached their treatment target

  • Conventional treat-to-target

    Other intervention

    Patients are treated according to an algorithm based on current European recommendations. The conventional treatment target, applicable to both arms and the target in the conventional arm, is all of: Disease Activity index in PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) remission (≤4), Enthesitis ≤1, Psoriasis Body Surface Area ≤3%

Treatment groups

202 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Conventional treat-to-targetOther 1 intervention
Group B: Imaging informed treat-to-targetExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Sustained Remission

Sustained remission defined as a combination of Very Low Disease Activity (VLDA) at all of the time points 16, 20 and 24 months. VLDA requires all of the following to be met: Tender joint count (68) ≤ 1, swollen joint count (66) ≤ 1, Psoriasis Body Surface Area ≤ 3, Enthesitis≤ 1, Patient global assessment of disease severity VAS (0-100) ≤ 20, Pain VAS (0-100) ≤ 15 and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index ≤ 0.5.

Time frame
Sustained remission is defined by the patient meeting VLDA at all of 16, 20 and 24 month follow-up visits

Secondary outcomes

1

Patient global assessment of disease activity

Patient global assessment of disease activity on a 0-100 visual analogue scale (VAS), with higher scores Indicating more disease activity

Time frame
12 and 24 months
2

Patient pain assessment

Patient pain assessment on a 0-100 visual analogue scale, with higher scores Indicating more pain

Time frame
12 and 24 months
3

Patient fatigue assessment

Patient fatigue assessment on a 0-100 visual analogue scale, with higher scores Indicating more fatigue

Time frame
12 and 24 months
4

66 joint count for swollen joints

Structured 66 joint count for swollen joints

Time frame
12 and 24 months

Other outcomes

1

Patient global assessment of disease activity

Patient global assessment of disease activity on a 0-100 visual analogue scale, with higher scores Indicating more disease activity

Time frame
0-24 months
2

Patient pain assessment

Patient pain assessment on a 0-100 visual analogue scale, with higher scores Indicating more pain

Time frame
0-24 months
3

Patient fatigue assessment

Patient fatigue assessment on a 0-100 visual analogue scale, with higher scores Indicating more fatigue

Time frame
0-24 months
4

Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index

Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), higher scores indicating more disease activity

Time frame
0-24 months

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.