About this trial
This study focuses on examining the efficacy and clinical performance of immediate loading of early placed single implants.
The aim of the randomized controlled trial is to compare between two loading protocols (immediate versus conventional) of early placed implants (Type 2-3A) in terms of clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes.
Null hypothesis: There will be no significant differences in implant survival/success, stability, radiographic marginal bone level, and patient reported outcomes between immediately or conventionally loaded and early placed implants.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
aged 18 years or older
requiring single tooth replacement with dental implants in presence of four bone walls (mandible or maxilla)
having adequate bone volume
controlled oral hygiene
Disqualifiers
Any systemic condition that might jeopardize implant surgery
history of radiation therapy to the head and neck region
history of bisphosphonate therapy or other medications that may affect bone metabolism
smoking more than 10 cigarettes/day
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Immediate loading of early placed implants
DeviceImplants with active thread design will be used. The implants placed will be randomly allocated into either immediate loading or conventional loading group.
Conventional loading of early placed implants
DeviceDefinitive loading of early placed implants upon successful osteointegration (after 8 weks)
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Marginal bone level changes
Marginal bone level changes by standardized periapical radiographs.
Secondary outcomes
Implant failure rate
defined as implant removal
Implant stability
Osstell readings
Midfacial mucosal level
as measured by periodontal probe
Pink and white esthetic scores
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.