About this trial
Operatively managed diabetic ankle fractures have significant risk for complications. The cause for failure is likely multifactorial, however, a component of failure has to do with an inability to process pain and pressure normally. This loss of protective sensation allows for an increase in abnormal stresses placed on the recently repaired fractures. Historically, diabetics have been kept non weight bearing for extended periods of time, which has its own functional and cardiovascular issues. The purpose of the study is to determine if a protocol of immediate weight bearing with a hindfoot offloading brace after surgically corrected ankle fracture in a diabetic patient will maintain adequate motion, have no difference in complications when compared to regular non-immediate weight bearing protocols, and lead to good outcome scores and patient satisfaction scores
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Adults 18 and ove
Positive for diabetes
Positive monofilament test
Isolated ankle fracture (non-pilon) and undergoing operative intervention within 3 weeks of fracture
Disqualifiers
Children
Pregnant patients
No signs of diabetes complicated by neuropathy
Non-operative ankle fractures
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Postoperative protocol (Immediate weight bearing)
Other interventionAfter ORIF of the ankle fracture, the patient will be randomized to follow an immediate weight bearing rehabilitation protocol using an offloading hindfoot brace
Postoperative Protocol (Delayed Weight Bearing)
Other interventionAfter ORIF of the ankle fracture, the patient will be randomized to follow a standard delayed weight-bearing rehabilitation protocol
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Adverse Events
Adverse Events by type over time, severity, seriousness, and relatedness. AEs will be tabulated and summarized as counts and percentages. AEs will also be cross-tabulated according to: 1. Severity; 2. Unanticipated Adverse Device Effect (UADE) 3. Seriousness (Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Non-serious AE); 4. Device-Relatedness (Unrelated, Possibly Related, Probably Related, Definitely Related); 5. Procedure-Relatedness (Unrelated, Possibly Related, Probably Related, Definitely Related).
Secondary outcomes
AAOS Foot and Ankle Score
The AAOS foot and ankle questionnaire is a patient-administrated 25-item survey specifically developed for foot and ankle-related disability. The questionnaire is divided into two scales, the Foot and Ankle Core scale, comprised of 20 questions and the Shoe Comfort Scale with five questions. The questions themselves are distributed among five different categories: Pain (9 items), function (6 items), stiffness and swelling (2 items), giving way (3 items) and shoe comfort (5 items). Answers are then measured on a scale of 1 to 5 or 6, with 1 being the best outcome score.
PROMIS Score
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) is a flexible set of tools designed to measure self-reported physical, mental and social health and wellbeing. PROMIS instruments contain a fixed number of items from seven PROMIS domains: depression; anxiety; physical function; pain interference; fatigue; sleep disturbance; and ability to participate in social roles and activities. The questionarie assesses each of the 7 PROMIS domains with 4 questions. The questions are ranked on a 5-point Likert Scale. There is also one 11-point rating scale for pain intensity. Norm-based scores are calculated for each domain on the PROMIS measures, so that a score of 50 represents the mean or average of the reference population. A score of 60 means that the person is one standard deviation above the reference population (standard deviation = 10).
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Kyle Schweser MD
Lead sponsor
University of Missouri-Columbia
Sponsor institution