Impact of a Counseling Consultation in the Workplace for Smoker Health Professionals

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorGroupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble

About this trial

Smoking is still a major cause of premature death in France (75,000 deaths a year). Health professionals also seem to be affected by smoking, but few studies have been carried out on this population of smokers. While having a job can be protective, certain working conditions are at risk: night shifts, stress, physical strain, burnout... In 2010, 23% of nurses and 40% of nursing auxiliaries were smokers. More recently, a study of 10,000 health professionals in a French health establishment in 2022 revealed a rate of 32% among nursing auxiliaries.

Data on smoking among health professionals is still scarce. Yet they seem essential, given that smoking among healthcare professionals seems to be an obstacle to dealing with patients' consumption and contributes to the erroneous representations that persist in psychiatry more than elsewhere, such as: "smoking with a patient makes an alliance with them", "smoking is a way of reducing psychological tension", "patients have other problems to deal with", "it won't work because they've been smoking for years". Smoking in mental health facilities is high among both patients and professionals.

Investigators now know that smoking has an impact on mood disorders and sleep. It aggravates all somatic and psychological pathologies and predisposes people to more diabetes, chronic bronchitis, cardiovascular disease, cancer, etc. It also interacts with many drugs.

Smoking screening and cessation assistance have become an indicator of quality somatic care in mental health institutions.

Investigators hypothesise that a consultation in the workplace can help employees to change their smoking habits.

The aims of this study are to assess the effect of a workplace smoking clinic on smokers employed in a mental health institution, and to describe their smoking habits and profiles according to occupational category, with a view to implementing appropriate preventive and treatment measures.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age ≥ 18 years

Health professional

Daily smoker of at least 1 cigarette or joint per day and every day

Willingness to quit smoking

Disqualifiers

Smoking via vaporizer exclusively

Occasional (i.e. not daily) smoker or exhaled carbon monoxyde at inclusion < 9 ppm

Resignation, transfer or end of employment contract during the study period (1 year)

Unable to undergo study follow-up for geographical, social or psychological reasons

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • exhaled carbon monoxyde measurement

    Diagnostic test

    At the initial tobacco consultation: measurement of exhaled carbon monoxyde. At the tobaccology consultation at 12 months, measurement of the cessation rate: no tobacco smoked in the last 7 days (self-reported), confirmed by a measurement of exhaled carbon monoxyde \< 9 ppm.

Treatment groups

30 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: consultation tabaccoExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Evalue the effectiveness of a counseling consultation in the workplace among smoker health professionals.

Cessation rate at 12 months: At the 12-month visit, no smoking in the last 7 days (self-reported) confirmed by a measurement of exhaled carbon monoxyde \< 9 ppm.

Time frame
At 12 month

Secondary outcomes

1

Prevalence of anxiety and depressive disorders

Mean Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores To screen for anxiety and depressive symptoms, the following interpretation can be proposed for each of the scores (A and D) Total Score \[0;21\] * 7 or less: no symptoms * 8 to 10: doubtful symptomatology * 11 or more: definite symptomatology

Time frame
at inclusion
2

Prevalence of chronic pain

Pain numerical scale \> 3/10 for 3 months or more

Time frame
at inclusion
3

Prevalence of chronic fatigue

Pichot scale, cut-off = 22

Time frame
at inclusion
4

Effectiveness of counseling consultation on anxiety and depressive disorders

Mean Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores To screen for anxiety and depressive symptoms, the following interpretation can be proposed for each of the scores (A and D), Total score \[0;21\] * 7 or less: no symptoms * 8 to 10: doubtful symptomatology * 11 or more: definite symptomatology

Time frame
at inclusion, 6 months and 12 months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.