Impact of a Physical Exercise Program in a Rural Area

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age59+
SponsorUniversity of Valencia

About this trial

With this work we want to assess whether there are differences in the amount of physical activity per week, measured by accelerometry in 3 groups of subjects, where one group (G1) has been carrying out a PA program called "Enguera Sé Saludable" for a year. another group (G2) newly introduced to the same exercise program, and a control group (G3) that does not carry out an exercise program but declared itself active.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Adults over 59 years of age.

Patients who comply with accelerometer times for 7 days.

Patients who correctly complete the accelerometer registration sheet.

Patients who complete the informed consent

Disqualifiers

Patients who do not wear the accelerometer 600 minutes a day for at least 3 days on weekdays and 480 minutes for at least 1 day on the weekend.

Patients who suffer from illness during data collection.

Patients who do not wear the accelerometer for 7 days. Be in IPAQ category 1 (low level of AF).

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Exercise program

    Other intervention

    Multimodal and multicompetent exercise program 2 days a week for 60 minutes and 1 day of walking exercise for 60 minutes.

Treatment groups

140 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: Exercise T0Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Exercise T1Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group C: ControlNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

MVPA

Mooderate to vigorous amount of activity. Assess the amount of moderate to vigorous exercise during accelerometry for one week.

Time frame
1 year

Secondary outcomes

1

Up & Go

Evaluate basic mobility in older people and their probable gait and balance disorders. 1. Tell the elderly person to sit in the chair with their back supported by the backrest. 2\. Ask the person to get up from the chair, walk at a normal pace for a distance of 3 meters, have the person turns around, walks back to the chair and sits down again. 3. Measure the time the older person takes the test. Timing begins when the person He starts to get up from the chair and ends when he returns to the chair and sits down. 4\. Give a test try Normal: \<10 seconds. * Mild mobility disability: 11-13 seconds. * High risk of falls: \>13 seconds

Time frame
1 year
2

Tinetti

Test that analyzes certain variables to evaluate gait and balance. The higher the score, the better the performance. The highest score of the gait subscale is 12, for balance 16. The sum of both scores for fall risk. The higher the score\>the lower the risk \<19 High risk of falls

Time frame
1 year
3

SPBB

Short Physical Performance Battery is an instrument that evaluates three aspects of mobility: balance, walking speed and strength of movement. limbs or lower extremities to get up from a chair. Supports the probable detection of outcomes adverse events such as mortality and institutionalization, as well as their association with disability.

Time frame
1 YEAR
4

Sit to Stand Test

Assesses the functional strength of the lower limbs, A chair was required on a flat surface and the subject was asked not to lean on his arms to get up and sit down, therefore, he was given a test opportunity with the instruction not to lean on. The patient is informed that the test consists of performing as many repetitions as possible of getting up and sitting down in a chair during a period of 60 seconds and that the time elapsed to the tenth repetition of getting up and sitting down will be timed at the same time. .

Time frame
1 year

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.