About this trial
This study aims to evaluate whether adding a continuous mist of saltwater (saline nebulization) to warmed, humidified air can improve the properties of mucus in the lungs compared to humidified air alone.
Some patients with chronic lung diseases produce large amounts of thick mucus, which can be difficult to clear and may worsen breathing. Making this mucus easier to move and remove could help improve comfort and breathing.
In this study, 35 adult patients hospitalized for lung conditions with excessive mucus production will participate. Each patient will receive both treatments on two different days, in a random order:
Heated humidified air alone Heated humidified air combined with continuous saline nebulization This design allows each patient to serve as their own comparison. At the beginning and end of each session, a physiotherapist will help patients clear their airways, and mucus samples will be collected. Each treatment session will last 4 hours.
The collected mucus will be analyzed in a laboratory to measure how thick, sticky, or elastic it is, and how much force is needed to move it. The main goal is to determine whether the combined treatment makes mucus easier to clear.
The study will also assess patient comfort, breathing difficulty, ease of clearing mucus, and sleep quality after treatment.
The results of this study may help improve airway care for patients with chronic lung diseases by identifying more effective ways to manage excessive mucus.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Age > 18 years old
Hospitalized in pulmonology unit
Excessive airways secretions disease: COPD, Bronchiectassies, Cystic Fibrosis, Primary Ciliary Diskynesia
Disqualifiers
Age < 18 years old
Under invasive or non invasive ventilation
>15L/min of oxygen
Mucoactive treatment
Trial design
Crossover
Treatments tested in this trial
Saline Nebulization
DeviceContinuous saline nebulization through HFNC
Heated humidification
DeviceHeated humidification through HFNC
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Critical strain
Rheological property
Secondary outcomes
Elastic and viscous modulus
Comfort
Lickert scale 0 - 6, higher score is a better outcome
Dyspnea
Borge modified scale 0 - 10, higher score is a worse outcome
Sleep Quality
Lickert scale 0 - 6, higher score is a better outcome
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain
Lead sponsor
Fisher and Paykel Healthcare
Collaborator
Aerogen
Collaborator
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: