The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of face-to-face training of general practitioners on the implementation of a shared decision (in the context of colorectal cancer screening), versus current practice (i.e. without training in the patient-centered approach).
Eligible for organized CRC screening,
Having declared as attending clinician a general practitioner investigator of the study
AND able and willing to comply with all trial requirements
Crohn's disease
None
Parallel
patient-centered approach training
Procedure/Surgeryface to face training of general practitioner of interventional arm
The Measurement of the achievement oh the shared decision shared decision making in CRC screening using the patient shared a self-decision-making questionnaire (SDM-Q9), validated in French
comparison of the mean of the SDM-Q9 between each arm of the study from 0 (weak shared decision) to 100 (strong shared decision). We will compare the average of the SDM-Q9 between each arm of the study
Evaluate the effect of training on the CRC screening rate
participation rate in organized CRC screening at individual level. Measurements taken 6 months after the last patient was included in the trial,
Confronting the shared decision made by the patient regarding the completion of CRC screening
Participation rate (IC95%) in CRC screening according to the patient's decision at the end of the initial consultation: wish to be screened, neutral, wish not to be screened.
Explore understanding of the shared decision process among general practitioners and patients
Proportion (IC95%) of included patients with a SURE test result of less than 4
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
