Implementation of an Allergic Rhinitis Severity Questionnaire in ENT Consultations

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversity Hospital, Strasbourg, France

About this trial

Allergic rhinitis is a very common condition (affecting 1 in 5 people in Europe) and a costly one for society (direct and indirect costs). Symptoms vary depending on the time of year, and treatments are primarily symptomatic, with follow-up in ENT consultations. Scientific societies (EAACI, FDA, EMA) recommend using a universal tool (severity score) (the CSMS score, SCST in French) to monitor severity and follow-up, and to obtain consistent data that can be extrapolated to other scientific data (meta-analyses).

Therefore, investigators in the ENT department use this SCST score (as well as others such as the SNOT 22 score) to assess the severity of allergic rhinitis in our patients and its progression.

Tbe investigators wish to confirm the acceptability of this tool for patients, and the statistical value of its properties.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Adult (≥18 years)

Follow-up at the ENT department of Hautepierre University Hospital for allergic rhinitis

Disqualifiers

Asymptomatic individuals not requiring follow-up consultations.

Trial population

Adult (≥18 years) having follow-up at the ENT department of Hautepierre University Hospital for allergic rhinitis

Trial design

Design model

Case-only

Time perspective

Retrospective

Treatments tested in this trial

Not listed

Trial groups

No trial groups listed

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Self-Assessment Clinical Symptom Score (SCST)

1. Rating Scale Each symptom is rated by the patient according to its intensity: * 0: absent * 1: mild * 2: moderate * 3: severe 2. Calculating the Score * Add the scores for each symptom. * The total SCST score reflects the overall severity of the symptoms: * Low score → mild symptoms * High score → severe symptoms 3. Interpretation * Before treatment: establish a baseline. * After treatment: compare the scores to assess effectiveness. * A decrease in the score indicates clinical improvement.

Time frame
Up to 6 months

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.