Implementation of Home Monitoring in Patients With Pulmonary Fibrosis

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorErasmus Medical Center

About this trial

The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of structurally replacing half of the outpatient clinic visits for patients with pulmonary fibrosis by home monitoring and video consultations on patient self-management and health(care) outcomes.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

A multidisciplinary ILD team diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis according to ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT guidelines;

Adults (=/>18 years).

Disqualifiers

Patients who are not able to speak, read and/or write in Dutch;

Patients with no access to the internet;

Patients with a life expectancy of less than 1 year as determined by the treating healthcare provider;

Patients who are or have been using a home monitoring program for PF.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Home monitoring care

    Combination product

    Patients in the home monitoring group will receive a home spirometer, pulse oximetry meter, and access to a smartphone or tablet app, where they can perform home based measurements weekly and complete PROMs. Furthermore, this app includes disease specific information and allows for direct communication with the hospital via eConsultation. In the home monitoring group, half of the outpatient clinic visits will alternately be replaced by remote visits via video consultation.

Treatment groups

220 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Hospital-based careNo intervention 0 interventions
Group B: Home monitoring careExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Patient self-management

Delta score of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) questionnaire. The PAM is a 13-item survey assessing levels of patient activation in terms of managing their own health and healthcare. Total score ranges are 0-100, with higher scores indicating greater patient activation.

Time frame
Baseline to 12 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Patient self-management

The Patient Activation Measure (PAM) questionnaire is a 13-item survey assessing levels of patient activation in terms of managing their own health and healthcare. Total score ranges are 0-100, with higher scores indicating greater patient activation.

Time frame
Baseline
2

Patient self-management

Delta score of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) questionnaire. The PAM is a 13-item survey assessing levels of patient activation in terms of managing their own health and healthcare. Total score ranges are 0-100, with higher scores indicating greater patient activation.

Time frame
Baseline to 6 months
3

Living with Pulmonary Fibrosis (L-PF) questionnaire

The Living with Pulmonary Fibrosis (L-PF) questionnaire is developed to assess symptoms and HRQOL in patients with Pulmonary Fibrosis. It consists of 44 items divided into two modules: symptoms (23 items) and impacts (21 items). The symptom module assesses shortness of breath, cough and fatigue. The impacts module assesses multiple aspects of HRQOL on a five-option numeric rating score. Overall scores range from 0 to 100, with higher numbers indicating a greater impairment.

Time frame
Baseline
4

Living with Pulmonary Fibrosis (L-PF) questionnaire

Delta scores of all domains of the Living with Pulmonary Fibrosis (L-PF) questionnaire will be assessed. The L-PF questionnaire is developed to assess symptoms and HRQOL in patients with Pulmonary Fibrosis. It consists of 44 items divided into two modules: symptoms (23 items) and impacts (21 items). The symptom module assesses shortness of breath, cough and fatigue. The impacts module assesses multiple aspects of HRQOL on a five-option numeric rating score. Overall scores range from 0 to 100, with higher numbers indicating a greater impairment.

Time frame
Baseline to 6 months

Other outcomes

1

Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses

The costs, cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses will be conducted from a healthcare system and societal perspective.

Time frame
Baseline to 12 months
2

Healthcare professional- and patient satisfaction

Healthcare providers and patients will be asked about their satisfaction and experiences on home monitoring.

Time frame
12 months
3

Time to detection of a decline of 10% in in-hospital versus home-based FVC

Time frame
Baseline to 12 months
4

Travel movements

Explorative evaluation of the effect of home monitoring on travel movements.

Time frame
Baseline to 12 months

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Erasmus Medical Center

Lead sponsor

Zuyderland Medisch Centrum, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands

Collaborator

Leiden University Medical Center, LUMC, Leiden, The Netherlands

Collaborator

UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands

Collaborator

Rijnstate, Arnhem, the Netherlands

Collaborator

Catharina, Eindhoven, the Netherlands

Collaborator

MC Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands

Collaborator

OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Collaborator

Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands

Collaborator

Amphia, Breda, the Netherlands

Collaborator

St. Antonius Hospital

Collaborator