Implementing AI-Assisted, Patient-Friendly Imaging Report Summaries to Enhance Oncology Care Delivery

ConditionOncology
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison

About this trial

The implementation of the AI-assisted radiology summary tool into clinical workflows is being conducted as part of a standard-of-care quality improvement (QI) initiative at UW Health. The evaluation of this tool's impact via structured feedback from patients and providers is being undertaken as a prospective research study.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age 18 years or older

Having a current or prior cancer diagnosis (any cancer type)

Has active access to the UW Health MyChart patient portal.

Receiving care at UW Health within the Division of Hematology, Medical Oncology and Palliative Care or Department of Gynecologic Oncology.

Disqualifiers

Are unable to provide informed consent due to cognitive impairment or other limitations, as determined by the clinical or study team.

Enrolled in an active interventional clinical trial. Patients on biospecimen, registry, or non-interventional studies are eligible.

For the Patient Interview group only: Patients with radiographic disease progression will be excluded.

Trial population

Cancer patients undergoing imaging studies as part of their routine clinical care at UW Health and providers who have access to the scan summary tool.

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

Not listed

Trial groups

2,000 Participants
are grouped into 2 trial groups
Group A: Patient Participants
Group B: Provider Participants

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Proportion of Patient Participants who report the information presented in their results is "Somewhat easy to understand" or "Very easy to understand" when reviewed by themselves

Baseline data collected in a 10-15 minute survey from patient participants pre-implementation and in a 10-15 minute survey from patient participants post-implementation.

Time frame
up to 15 minutes
2

Perceived impact of scan-result-related patient queries on Provider Participant workload

Scored from 1 (no impact) to 5 (very frequently), higher scores indicate higher impact on workload. Data collected at baseline (pre-implementation) and 3 months (post-implementation).

Time frame
baseline, 3 months

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

1

Proportion of Patient Participants who report that reviewing scans increases their anxiety

Baseline data collected in a 10-15 minute survey from patient participants pre-implementation and in a 10-15 minute survey from patient participants post-implementation.

Time frame
up to 15 minutes
2

Proportion of Patient Participants who report that they were "somewhat" or "very" satisfied with how scan results were shared and explained

Baseline data collected in a 10-15 minute survey from patient participants pre-implementation and in a 10-15 minute survey from patient participants post-implementation.

Time frame
up to 15 minutes
3

Proportion of Patient Participants who report that they "almost always" or "often" contact their provider to ask questions regarding their scan results prior to their follow-up visit

Baseline data collected in a 10-15 minute survey from patient participants pre-implementation and in a 10-15 minute survey from patient participants post-implementation.

Time frame
up to 15 minutes
4

Provider Participant-reported frequency of scan-result-related patient queries

Scored from 1 (never) to 5 (very frequently), higher scores indicate higher frequency. Data collected at baseline (pre-implementation) and 3 months (post-implementation).

Time frame
baseline, 3 months

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.