iNav-based, Automated Coronary Magnetic Resonance Angiography for the Detection of Coronary Artery Stenosis

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorAarhus University Hospital

About this trial

Ischaemic Heart Disease (IHD) is the worlds leading cause of death. IHD is often caused by a narrowing of the coronary arteries, which prevents blood from flowing to the heart muscle, causing pain and damage to the heart. If an individual has a myocardial infarction (MI), parts of the heart that are damaged cannot be repaired. Therefore, it is important to identify and treat the narrowing of the arteries before an MI occurs.

At present there are 2 main methods of identifying narrowing of the arteries. The first is an invasive procedure, the other using a CT scan. Whilst both methods are effective, they entail risk. The invasive procedure can damage the coronary arteries, whilst the CT scan exposes patients to radiation and contrast, which can increase the risk of cancer and allergic reactions.

Magnetic Resonance (MR) scanning is an alternative to these methods, but it has been limited in use in the past due, in part, to the high technical knowledge required to obtain images. In addition, there is a degree of subjectivity in the selection of the mid-diastolic rest period, potentially affecting consistency of results. This means it is difficult to use in a day-to-day hospital environment. However, recent technological developments using artificial intelligence mean that images can be acquired in a more automated and consistent fashion. This new scan has yet to be tested in a clinical trial.

Therefore, the objective of the clinical study is to test this new scan to determine its efficacy. 230 patients at 5 sites at risk of coronary artery disease, who have been referred for invasive coronary angiography, will undergo both their angiography and the new MR scan. The MR scan will then be compared to CCTA for diagnostic accuracy and image quality.

The investigators hypothesise that the new MR scan will have the same diagnostic accuracy as invasive coronary angiography, with no differences in interpretation of the images across the 5 different hospitals.

If proven effective, this would demonstrate that MR scanning of the coronary arteries could prove a safe, clinically useful alternative to both CT scanning and invasive assessment of coronary artery narrowing. In addition, if there is no difference across different locations, it would demonstrate that these scans can be performed consistently, facilitating implementation on a healthcare-system wide basis.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

≥18 years old

Subject has provided informed written consent

BMI < 35

Sinus Rhythm

Disqualifiers

Any contraindication to CMR

Previous coronary revascularisation

Inability to take sublingual nitroglycerin

Irregular heart rate

Trial population

The study population will be drawn from individuals referred to CCTA for assessment of the coronary arteries living in the regions of the 5 study sites, which are based at the following hospitals: * Aarhus University Hospital (Aarhus, Denmark) * Herlev-Gentofte Hospital (Copenhagen, Denmark) * Kings College London (London, UK) * Hammersmith Hospital (London, UK) * Rigshospitalet (Copenhagen, Denmark)

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Coronary Magnetic Resonance Angiography (CMRA)

    Diagnostic test

    A highly optimised CMRA protocol integrating advanced, automated software for detection of coronary artery stenosis

Treatment groups

160 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Patient Group1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Haemodynamically significant CAD

Number of patients with haemodynamically significant CAD, defined as coronary artery diameter stenosis ≥50%, as assessed by CMRA, compared to CCTA.

Time frame
CCTA will take place on clinical indication to investigate risk of CAD following an episode of chest pain. CMRA will be acquired ± 4 weeks compared to CCTA.

Secondary outcomes

1

Image quality

Qualitative assessment of the image quality of the CMRA images. The scale used will be: 0, non-diagnostic; 1, poor (limited coronary vessel visibility or noisy image); 2, average (coronary vessel visible but diagnostic confidence low); 3, good (coronary artery adequately visualised and diagnostic quality image); and 4, excellent (coronary artery clearly depicted).

Time frame
CCTA will take place on clinical indication to investigate risk of CAD following an episode of chest pain. CMRA will be acquired ± 4 weeks compared to CCTA.

Other outcomes

1

Inter-reader variability in interpretation of the CMRA protocol

Number of patients with haemodynamically significant CAD, defined as coronary artery diameter stenosis ≥50%, as assessed by CMRA, as compared between different investigators at different sites in the multi-centre study.

Time frame
CCTA will take place on clinical indication to investigate risk of CAD following an episode of chest pain. CMRA will be acquired ± 4 weeks compared to CCTA.
2

Pulse rate

Pulse during CMRA scan acquisition and association with image quality metrics

Time frame
CCTA will take place on clinical indication to investigate risk of CAD following an episode of chest pain. CMRA will be acquired ± 4 weeks compared to CCTA.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Aarhus University Hospital

Lead sponsor

University of Aarhus

Sponsor institution

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: