Indocyanine Green for Detection of Sentinel Lymph Nodes In Comparison to ICG Plus Technetium in the Evaluation of Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma

ConditionVulvar Cancer
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexFemale
Age18+
SponsorHamilton Health Sciences Corporation

About this trial

The aim of this study is to confirm prospectively if the use of near infrared-indocyanine green (NIR-ICG) alone offers similar accuracy and sensitivity to the gold standard dual technique for sentinel lymph node detection in early stage vulvar cancer.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

None

Disqualifiers

None

Trial population

Women \>= 18 years of age with invasive vulvar cancer Meet criteria for SLN staging (\>1mm depth of invasion or \>2 cm size, \< 4 cm size, no clinically suspicious nodes on physical exam or imaging, no prior groin surgery)

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

  • ICG alone

    Procedure/Surgery

    SLNs will be detected with ICG alone, labelled as such, and subsequent to that tested with Gamma probe for accuracy

Treatment groups

58 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Sequential ICG and Technetium Detection1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

false-negative rate of the detection technique using ICG alone compared to ICG and Technetium (Dual method) per groin

This will be calculated as the number of groins for which positive SLN were missed using ICG alone; i.e. the number of groins for which ICG did not detect a positive SLN but was detected by ICG and Technetium, divided by the number of groins for which surgery was performed.

Time frame
2 years

Secondary outcomes

1

1. The proportion of positive SLN detected by ICG for each groin divided by the total number of positive SLN detected using ICG and Technetium.

the unit of analysis is the number of SLN for each groin.

Time frame
2 years

Other outcomes

1

2. The proportion of groins for which all SLN extracted were identified by ICG.

This is defined as the number of groins for whom, all SLN extracted were identified by ICG compared to the number of SLN extracted by ICG and Technetium.

Time frame
2 years
2

3. The proportion of SLN extracted by ICG for each groin divided by the total number of SLN extracted using ICG and Technetium.

The unit of analysis is the number of SLN for each groin.

Time frame
2 years
3

4. Rate of successful mapping of at least 1 SLN (per groin)

proportion

Time frame
2 years
4

5. The specificity of positive SLN detected and number of SLN extracted by ICG will also be calculated, looking at the number of SLN which were detected by ICG alone.

Appropriate caution will be performed when looking at this outcome, understanding that evaluation of whether Technetium detected a SLN will be performed after the SLN is extracted, which is not consistent with normal practice and could be subject to bias.

Time frame
2 years

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation

Lead sponsor

Juravinski Cancer Centre Foundation

Collaborator