About this trial
There is no clear recommendation in international guidelines regarding the type of suture to be used for closing emergency midline laparotomies. It is recommended to follow the same principles as in elective surgery, thus performing the closure with a continuous suture of slowly absorbable monofilament 2-0 with small-bites technique. Currently, there are several slowly absorbable sutures available on the market, and our center uses two: PDS® and Monomax®. These two sutures are currently used interchangeably at our institution based on the preferences of each surgeon.
Objective: study whether there are differences between these two sutures in the closure of emergency midline laparotomy.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
>18 years old, patients undergoing emergency midline laparotomy by the General Surgery Department.
Disqualifiers
<18 years old, previous midline laparotomy
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
PDS 2/0 vs Monomax 2/0
Procedure/SurgeryWe will include in the study patients who require an emergency midline laparotomy by the General and Digestive Surgery Department of the University Hospital Nuestra Señora de Candelaria. Patients will be randomized based on their medical record number: those with an even number will undergo laparotomy closure using PDS 2/0, and those with an odd number will receive Monomax 2/0.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Evisceration
Rate of evisceration
Secondary outcomes
Wound complication
Seroma, hematoma, infection
Incisional hernia
Evaluate the rate of incisional hernia during follow-up in outpatient consultations.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Hospital San Juan de Dios Tenerife
Lead sponsor
University Hospital of the Nuestra Señora de Candelaria
Sponsor institution