Innovative Sleep Quality Analysis Software Compared With Polysomnography

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne

About this trial

To diagnose sleep disorders, practitioners primarily use polysomnography (PSG), a precise but costly, cumbersome method that is limited to a single observation. This does not allow for longitudinal monitoring of sleep habits in real-world conditions. An alternative is offered with the C. Santé software receiving information from sensors installed on medical bed. This software analyzes cardiorespiratory parameters and sleep phases without disturbing the patient, enabling continuous and comfortable monitoring. A preliminary study aims to validate the reliability of the C. Santé software analysis, by comparing it to the PSG analysis, considered the gold standard.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Adult patients aged over 18 years.

Patients affiliated with or beneficiaries of a social security system.

Patients capable of completing all aspects of the study.

Patients who have signed informed consent for participation in the study

Disqualifiers

pregnancy

Patients suffering from an acute bacterial, fungal, or viral infection.

Patients unable to tolerate the placement of the PSG.

Patients with psychiatric disorders incompatible with the constraints associated with the need to spend two nights at the clinic.

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • C. Santé software compared to polysomnography

    Diagnostic test

    Patients visit the Sleep Unit at the Clinique Mutualiste for sleep disorders. During their consultation with the doctor, a polysomnography scheduled over two consecutive nights is proposed (this applies to any diagnosis of sleep disorders). At that time, they are also invited to participate in the study. After receiving information about the study and signing the consent form, the patient returns for their two consecutive nights equipped with PSG, which they spend on the bed equipped with sensors transmitting information to C. Santé software.

Treatment groups

33 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: PolysomnographyExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

The agreement in sleep efficiency measurement performed C. Santé software compared to polysomnography (PSG).

The study's objective will be met if the sleep efficiency measured by PSG and that calculated from C. Santé software differ by no more than 10%. This means the device will be considered effective if there is at least 90% agreement between PSG and the C. Santé software.

Time frame
"Up to 3 months after inclusion

Secondary outcomes

1

Accuracy of RR interval measurement

Determined from the ECG trace of the PSG compared to the C. Santé software

Time frame
Up to 3 months after inclusion
2

Accuracy of sleep phase duration measurement

Comparing PSG-calculated durations for sleep stages (N1: light slowwave sleep, N2: intermediate slow-wave sleep, N3: deep slow-wave sleep, REM: rapid eye movement sleep) to the C. Santé software calculation for slow-wave sleep (N) and REM.

Time frame
Up to 3 months after inclusion
3

Accuracy of respiratory rate measurement

Comparing C. Santé software measurements to nasal cannula measurements from PSG (analyzed in 30-second intervals)

Time frame
Up to 3 months after inclusion
4

Accuracy in positional data

Comparing the time spent lying on the back or side and the number of position changes as calculated by PSG (via a thoracic accelerometer) and by C. Santé software.

Time frame
Up to 3 months after inclusion

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: