Integrated Motivational Interviewing and Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy Intervention for Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Among Malaysian Primary School Students: A Feasibility Trial Protocol

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age12-12
SponsorUniversiti Utara Malaysia

About this trial

This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary effects of the MIND-SET Intervention Module, an integrated Motivational Interviewing and Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (MI-REBT) intervention, among Malaysian primary school students involved in Non-Suicidal Self-Injury (NSSI) behaviour. The module is designed to reduce self-injurious behaviour, improve emotional regulation, and enhance readiness for change among 12-year-old students in school settings. This study will use a quasi-experimental design involving three groups: a MIND-SET intervention group, a PRISMA Mental Health Module group, and a treatment-as-usual group. Data will be collected at pre-intervention, post-intervention, and follow-up stages using validated psychological instruments. The findings are expected to support the development of culturally responsive, school-based mental health interventions for children involved in NSSI behaviour in Malaysia.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Primary school students aged 12 years old.

Students identified with Non-Suicidal Self-Injury (NSSI) behaviour through school mental health screening and assessment procedures.

Able to understand and participate in group counselling sessions.

Written informed consent obtained from parents or guardians.

Disqualifiers

Students currently receiving intensive psychiatric treatment or psychological -intervention for severe mental health conditions.

Students identified with active suicidal intent requiring immediate clinical intervention.

Students with severe cognitive or developmental impairments that may interfere with participation in group intervention activities.

Students who are unable to attend the scheduled intervention sessions consistently.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • MIND-SET Intervention Module

    Behavioral

    A structured school-based intervention module integrating Motivational Interviewing (MI) and Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT) approaches to reduce Non-Suicidal Self-Injury behaviour, improve emotional regulation, and enhance readiness for change among Malaysian primary school students through group counselling sessions.

  • PRISMA Mental Health Module

    Behavioral

    A structured school-based mental health intervention module developed by the Ministry of Education Malaysia (KPM) implemented as the standard care benchmark for students.

Treatment groups

105 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: MIND-SET Intervention GroupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Standard School Counselling GroupActive comparator 1 intervention
Group C: Treatment as Usual GroupNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Change in Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Frequency

Measured using the translated version of the Six-Item Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Instrument (Prinstein et al., 2010). The instrument consists of the frequency of self-injury behavior using a 5-point scale: 0 (never), 1 (1-2 times), 2 (3-5 times), 3 (6-9 times), and 4 (10 times or more). Scores range from 0 to 4 per item. A higher score indicates a higher frequency of non-suicidal self-injury behavior (worse outcome).

Time frame
Baseline (Week 0), 4 weeks after baseline (Week 4), and 16 weeks after baseline (Week 16).

Secondary outcomes

1

Change in Emotional Dysregulation

Measured using the Malay version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-18 (DERS-18), originally developed by Gratz and Roemer (2004). The instrument consists of 18 items, with each item rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always). Total scores can range from a minimum of 18 to a maximum of 90. A higher total score indicates a greater level of emotional dysregulation, representing a worse outcome.

Time frame
Baseline (Week 0), 4 weeks after baseline (Week 4), and 16 weeks after baseline (Week 16).
2

Change in Readiness for Change

Measured using the translated short version of the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment (URICA-S), developed and validated by Mander et al. (2017). The instrument contains 12 items mapping across four distinct subscales representing the Stages of Change framework: Precontemplation, Contemplation, Action, and Maintenance. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). Individual subscale scores range from 3 to 15. A composite Readiness to Change score is calculated by summing the Contemplation, Action, and Maintenance scores, and subtracting the Precontemplation score. Total composite scores range from a minimum of 4 to a maximum of 44, where higher scores indicate a greater readiness to change behavior (better outcome).

Time frame
Baseline (Week 0), 4 weeks after baseline (Week 4), and 16 weeks after baseline (Week 16).

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Universiti Utara Malaysia

Lead sponsor

Ministry of Education, Malaysia

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: