About this trial
Whether intracervical block with lidocaine 1% is superior to sham procedure - intracervical injection of saline 0.9% - in terms of pain control.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
Voluntary termination of pregnancy approved by a committee or missed abortion
18.0 to 22.5 gestational week (The gestational age in the case of a missed abortion is determined by the BPD - Biparietal Diameter, which is the determining measure for the ability to perform D&E.)
Singleton pregnancy
Disqualifiers
Multiple pregnancy
Women undergoing the procedure urgently due to cervical insufficiency, inevitable abortion, premature rupture of membranes, or suspected chorioamnionitis
Allergy to lidocaine
Women who do not speak Hebrew or English
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Intracervical block
Procedure/Surgerylocal injection of lidocain to the cervix
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Pain level using 0-100 Visual Analog Scale (100=worst pain)
Patients will be asked to rate their maximal pain level during the procedure of laminaria insertion using 0-100 Visual Analog Scale
Rate of patient reporting severe pain (VAS 75-100) during laminaria insertion
Patients will be asked to rate their maximal pain level during the procedure of laminaria insertion using 0-100 Visual Analog Scale
Secondary outcomes
The rate of complications
Complications during laminaria insertion: rupture of the membranes, cervical bleeding, false route; complication during dilation and evacuation - failure to complete the dilation and evacuation procedure
Acceptability of the procedure measured as the rate of patients who will state that they found the procedure acceptable
Patients will be asked to state whether they find the procedure they undergone acceptable
Locations
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: