About this trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the EndoScell Scanner (ES) imaging system can accurately assess tumor-free surgical margins during surgery for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG), compared with standard frozen-section pathology.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Is ES non-inferior to intraoperative frozen-section pathology in identifying positive or negative tumor margins? * Does ES shorten the time needed for margin assessment and reduce the number of additional tissue resections required?
Researchers will compare an ES-assisted surgical arm with a conventional frozen-section arm to see if ES improves margin accuracy, shortens operative time, and increases the rate of complete (R0) tumor removal.
Participants will
* undergo standard AEG resection with randomized assignment to either ES or frozen-section margin checks; * allow collection of margin tissue samples for ES, frozen-section, and final paraffin pathology; * attend routine follow-up visits for up to 2 years to monitor for local recurrence.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Plan to receive surgical resection of AEG;
Patients voluntarily participated in this study and signed the informed consent form;
Disqualifiers
Patients who are allergic to methylene blue and fluorescein sodium;
Patients with severe cardiovascular or circulatory system diseases and cannot tolerate surgery;
Participated in other clinical trials of research drugs or devices in the past month;
Unable to understand the test requirements or unable to complete the study follow-up plan;
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
EndoSCell System
DeviceEndoSCell Scaner (ES) is a new type of intraoperative cell-level fluorescence-guided imaging technology that can be used for direct and rapid intraoperative tissue cell interpretation. This technology uses a handheld cell microscope system to magnify local tissue by about 1280 times, and can perform rapid real-time scanning and imaging of in vivo or excised ex vivo tissue.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Accuracy
Using paraffin pathology as the gold standard, the accuracy of ES system and frozen pathology for AEG resection margin was evaluated: Accuracy Rate = true positive + true negative/total number of samples.
Secondary outcomes
Evaluation of R0 resection rate
The proportion of surgical resection specimens without residual tumor at the resection margin using paraffin pathology as the gold standard.
Positive margin rate
Using paraffin pathology as the gold standard, the proportion of ES interpretation as positive but frozen pathology showing negative
Evaluation of the actual resection margin distance during ES-assisted AEG
Evaluation of the actual resection margin distance during ES-assisted AEG
Evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of ES technology
Evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of ES technology
Other outcomes
Accuracy of ES interpretation in different Siewert classifications (type II vs. type III)
Accuracy of ES interpretation in different Siewert classifications (type II vs. type III)
Locations
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: