Introduction of an Operating Room Black Box to Identify, Analyse and Prevent Errors in the Vascular Hybrid Room

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversity Ghent

About this trial

The "OR Black box", an inclusive multiport data capturing system has been developed and successfully used for detailed analysis of laparoscopic surgical procedures. A pilot study has shown that this system can be successfully installed in the hybrid room at Ghent University Hospital and used for detailed analysis of intra-operative errors and radiation safety issues in endovascular procedures.

Secondary analysis of pilot study data via direct video coding assessed the relationship between leadership style of the surgeon and team behavior and possible fluctuations during surgery.

This novel approach allows a prospective objective assessment of human and environmental factors as well as measurement of errors, events and outcomes. In this study, the aim is to use the acquired knowledge to characterize a chain of events, identify high-risk interventions and identify areas for improvement, both on an organizational, team or individual level.

Hypothesis: non-technical skills, environmental factors and teamwork in the hybrid room correlate with surgical technical performance and error rates. Furthermore, we hypothesize that incidents and adverse events can be tracked to a chain of errors that is influenced by technical and non-technical skills as well as environmental factors.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients undergoing elective (planned more than 48 hours) endovascular procedures.

Symptomatic aortic-iliac-femoral-popliteal-below the knee atherosclerotic stenotic or occlusive disease (PVI)

Endovascular exclusion of thoracic aortic, infrarenal abdominal aortic and/or iliac aneurysm repair (EVAR)

Disqualifiers

No consent of patient

No consent of all endovascular team members

Emergency procedure (planned < 48h before)

Endovascular procedure not treating atherosclerotic aortic-iliac-femoral-popliteal-below the knee disease or aortic-iliac aneurysm

Trial population

Patients planned for endovascular intervention at Ghent University Hospital.

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Massive Open Online Course (MOOC)

    Other intervention

    Combination of knowledge training with video scenarios and game-based learning provided to endovascular team members: surgeons, nurses and anesthetists

Treatment groups

400 Participants
are divided into 4 treatment groups
Group A: Pilot study0 interventions
Group B: Baseline measurement0 interventions
Group C: Post measurement1 intervention
Group D: Registry of endovascular cases0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Error

Evaluate errors during elective endovascular procedures in a hybrid room (error rate)

Time frame
Intraoperative errors will be measured per case through study completion, an average of 1.5 years.

Secondary outcomes

1

Technical skills - PVI

Assess technical skills of the surgeon on Global rating scale (range: 8-40) (the higher the score, the better)

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of 1.5 years
2

Technical skills - EVAR - GRS

Assess technical skills of the surgeon on Global rating scale (GRS) (range: 8-40) (the higher the score, the better)

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of 1.5 years
3

Technical skills - EVAR - PRS

Assess technical skills of the surgeon on Procedure Specific rating scale (PRS) (range: 7-35) (the higher the score, the better)

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of 1.5 years
4

Technical skills - EVAR - EVARATE

Assess technical skills of the surgeon on EVARATE (EndoVascular Aortic Repair Assessment of Technical Expertise) (range: 7-35) (the higher the score, the better)

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of 1.5 years

Other outcomes

1

Team behavior

Assessment of team behavior indicators (speaking up, knowledge sharing, collaboration) via direct video coding

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of 1.5 years
2

Leadership style

Assessment of leadership style according to the 'full range of leadership' theory via direct video coding

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of 1.5 years

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

University Ghent

Lead sponsor

University of Toronto

Collaborator