About this trial
The dosage of paclitaxel, an adjuvant chemotherapy agent for endometrial and ovarian cancer, is typically calculated based on the patient's body surface area (BSA). However, cancer patients with the same BSA may exhibit significant differences in body composition, which could influence the distribution pattern of paclitaxel in the body. These variations may lead to individual differences in drug tolerance and adverse effects. Such variability not only impacts the patient's treatment experience and quality of life but may also increase medical costs, including hospitalization, emergency department visits, and additional treatments required to manage chemotherapy-induced toxicities.
Our preliminary study results indicate that skeletal muscle area (SMA) and skeletal muscle index (SMI), as assessed through computed tomography (CT) imaging, are significantly associated with the incidence of Grade 3 or higher leukopenia or neutropenia following the first two cycles of chemotherapy in patients with endometrial cancer. Furthermore, the predictive accuracy of these CT-derived muscle measurements surpasses the clinical judgment made by physicians based on conventional treatment guidelines. Patients who develop Grade 3 or higher leukopenia or neutropenia during the first two cycles are more likely to experience more frequent occurrences of Grade 3 or higher chemotherapy-related adverse effects in subsequent treatment cycles.
However, no study has comprehensively investigated the relationship between body composition, chemotherapy dosing, and adverse effects. Therefore, this trial aims to examine the impact of body composition on chemotherapy dose adjustments and adverse effects. By utilizing body composition data extracted from abdominal CT imaging through this product, this study seeks to establish a risk stratification tool to assist physicians in treating patients with endometrial and ovarian cancer by providing a reference for chemotherapy dose reduction.
It is expected that through a precision chemotherapy strategy, the incidence of chemotherapy-related adverse effects can be reduced, thereby lowering medical resource expenditures incurred from managing these adverse effects, such as emergency department visits, hospitalizations, additional diagnostic tests, and supportive medication costs. Furthermore, this approach aims to improve patients' health-related quality of life and achieve a dual benefit of medical economic efficiency and clinical effectiveness.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
Able to comprehend and willing to participate in this clinical trial, with signed informed consent.
Underwent an abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan within three months prior to surgical treatment, with a non-contrast-enhanced single-slice image at the third lumbar vertebral level available for body composition analysis.
Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of endometrial cancer or ovarian cancer.
Age between 20 and 80 years.
Disqualifiers
Motion artifacts due to poor patient compliance.
Noticeable scoliosis or kyphosis.
Multiple lumbar vertebral compression fractures.
Significant generalized edema.
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
National Cheng Kung University Abdominal Muscle Group Medical Imaging Analysis Software
DevicePhase 2: The second phase will involve a prospective multicenter clinical trial, enrolling 294 patients with endometrial or ovarian cancer.Patients will be randomized into two groups (at least 147 per group): AI-assisted group (treatment group): Preoperative CT imaging will be used to assess body composition and classify patients into high-risk or low-risk categories.Chemotherapy dosing will be adjusted accordingly to evaluate treatment-related adverse effects and dose modifications. Non-AI-assisted group (control group): Patients will receive chemotherapy chemotherapy dosing adjustments based on standard clinical care.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
The accuracy of predicting the risk of Grade 3 or higher leukopenia or neutropenia as an adverse effect in endometrial and ovarian cancer patients undergoing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (including Paclitaxel) during the first two treatment cycles
Statistical methods: 1. The primary endpoint is a categorical variable, representing the incidence rate of patients experiencing adverse effects. Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test will be used to compare the incidence of Grade 3 or higher chemotherapy-related adverse effects between the experimental group (AI-assisted dose adjustment) and the control group (dose adjustment based on standard clinical guidelines). 2. Considering the impact of adverse effects across treatment cycles, a Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) analysis will be performed to assess the overall differences between groups. Analysis approach: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis will be conducted, including all randomized participants to minimize selection bias.
Secondary outcomes
Secondary endpoints include: Chemotherapy cycle delay, admission rate, health-related quality of life, two-year survival rates (PFS, OS), and cost-effectiveness.
Chemotherapy Cycle Delay Description: % of patients with \>7-day delay in any chemo cycle (21 days/cycle). Time Frame: First two cycles Unit: % of participants Hospitalization Rate Description: % of patients hospitalized at least once during chemo. Time Frame: Up to 2 years Unit: % of participants HRQoL - CIPN Score Description: Change in CIPN score from baseline. Time Frame: Baseline, during chemo, 1-year follow-up Unit: Scale units (CIPN) HRQoL - EORTC-QoL Score Description: Change in EORTC-QoL global health status score. Time Frame: Baseline, during chemo, 1-year follow-up Unit: Scale units (EORTC-QoL) Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Description: Time from first chemo to progression or death. Time Frame: Up to 24 months Unit: Months Overall Survival (OS) Description: Time from first chemo to death from any cause. Time Frame: Up to 24 months Unit: Months Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) Description: Cost/QALY for AI-assisted vs. standard dosing. Time Frame: Up to 2 year
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: