Iruplinalkib in ALK-Positive Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma After Lorlatinib

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorPeking University Shenzhen Hospital

About this trial

This observational study aims to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of iruplinalkib in patients with advanced ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma who have progressed on or are intolerant to prior lorlatinib therapy. The results are expected to provide real-world evidence to inform clinical decision-making for this heavily pretreated patient population.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Population: Male or female patients aged ≥18 years.

Diagnosis: Histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced lung adenocarcinoma.

Molecular Status: Documentation of ALK rearrangement confirmed by a validated test (e.g., NGS, IHC, FISH).

Prior Therapy: Prior treatment with lorlatinib (in any line of therapy), with documented disease progression or intolerance.

Disqualifiers

Lack of Exposure: Patients who never actually received iruplinalkib or took only a trivial amount (e.g., < 1 week/cycle) before withdrawal for non-medical reasons.

Wrong Diagnosis: Active malignancy of other histological types (excluding treated basal cell carcinoma, etc.).

Confounding: Participation in another interventional clinical trial involving an investigational anti-tumor drug concurrently.

Pregnancy: Pregnant or breastfeeding women.

Trial population

ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma patients who receive Iruplinalkib after lorlatinib treatment.

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Cross-sectional

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Iruplinalkib tablets

    Drug

    180mg, QD

Treatment groups

20 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Treatment group1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Real-World Progression-Free Survival (rwPFS)

Time from treatment initiation to the earliest of death or clinical disease progression. Progression is defined by the treating provider's assessment recorded in the medical record, based on radiology, laboratory, or physical exam findings, distinct from RECIST-based radiographic progression.

Time frame
From index date through study completion, an average of 36 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Time to Next Treatment (TTNT)

TTNT is defined as the time interval from the index date (date of first dose of the study treatment) to the date of the first administration of a new (subsequent) systemic anti-cancer therapy. This outcome distinguishes the duration of the current line of therapy before a switch is made. Patients who die without receiving a subsequent therapy are censored at the date of death. Patients who remain on the study treatment or discontinue treatment without starting a new line are censored at their last known activity date or the data cutoff date.

Time frame
From index date to the start of next line of therapy, assessed up to 36 months
2

Overall survival (OS)

To assess overall survival, define as first dose to the death of the subject due to any cause

Time frame
From index date through study completion, an average of 36 months
3

Treatment-related adverse reactions ( TRAE )

All AEs will be evaluated by the investigators to determine their potential relationship to iruplinalkib treatment based on clinical judgment, temporal association, and alternative etiologies. Events assessed as possibly, probably, or definitely related to iruplinalkib will be classified as treatment-related adverse reactions (TRAEs). The TRAEs will be graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE, 5.0). Serious adverse events (SAEs) will be identified and recorded in accordance with standard definitions or are considered medically significant by the investigator.

Time frame
From the index date through the date of Iruplinalkib discontinuation or the start of a new anti-cancer therapy (whichever occurs first), assessed up to 36 months.

Other outcomes

1

Real-World Objective Response Rate (rwORR)

rwORR is defined as the proportion of patients with a best overall response (BOR) of real-world complete response (rwCR) or real-world partial response (rwPR) as documented in the electronic health records (EHR). Response assessment is based on the treating clinician's qualitative assessment in clinical notes (clinician-anchored) and/or radiology reports, without strictly requiring RECIST 1.1 measurements. Patients without sufficient data to assess response are considered non-responders.

Time frame
From index date until disease progression or start of new anti-cancer therapy, assessed up to 36 months
2

Real-World Disease Control Rate (rwDCR)

rwDCR is defined as the proportion of patients with a best overall response (BOR) of real-world complete response (rwCR), real-world partial response (rwPR), or real-world stable disease (rwSD). To be classified as rwSD, the condition must be maintained for a minimum duration (e.g., at least 6 weeks) from the index date. Assessment is derived from unstructured clinical notes (clinician-anchored).

Time frame
from index date until disease progression or start of new anti-cancer therapy, assessed up to 36 months

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Peking University Shenzhen Hospital

Lead sponsor

Shenzhen People's Hospital

Collaborator

Longgang District People's Hospital of Shenzhen

Collaborator

Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center

Collaborator

Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University

Collaborator

The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

Collaborator

People Hospital of New District Longhua Shenzhen

Collaborator