Is the Use of a Steam Mask an Effective Treatment for Paediatric Chalazion in Comparison to Traditional Warm Compresses?

ConditionChalazion
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age5-16
SponsorUniversity of Sheffield

About this trial

Is the use of a steam mask an effective treatment for paediatric chalazion in comparison to traditional warm compresses?

This study will aim to assess the difference between these two methods.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Diagnosed chalazion (isolated or multiple).

Aged between 5 - <16 years (reading age for participant information leaflets).

A minimum head circumference of 50cm.

Access to a microwave with a rotating plate.

Disqualifiers

Current or previous treatment including: triamcinolone acetonide injection and, incision and curettage.

Current treatment including: oral or topical antibiotics and/or topical steroids.

Other ocular co-morbidities (excluding blepharitis, meibomian gland dysfunction, and dry eye disease).

Dermatological diagnoses that contraindicate the use of heat on the face.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Steam device

    Device

    The steam mask is made up of a fabric mask with 2 detachable steam eye cups (fabric) that contain self-hydrating beads.

  • Warm Compress

    Other intervention

    A warm compress consists of a small towel / flannel that is soak in cooled boiled water and placed over the chalazion.

Treatment groups

28 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Steam maskExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Warm compressExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Size of chalazian

measured using the slit lamp

Time frame
From enrollment (first visit) to the end of the treatment at 8 weeks.

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.