IVUS-Guided Sirolimus-Coated Balloon Versus Sirolimus-Eluting Stent for De Novo Large Vessel Lesions in ACS

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorChina National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases

About this trial

The goal of this interventional study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB)-based strategy versus planned sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and de novo large-vessel coronary lesions. The main question is whether the SCB-based strategy is non-inferior to the SES strategy with respect to in-segment late lumen loss (LLL) at 9 months. Following adequate lesion preparation and confirmation according to the prespecified angiographic and IVUS criteria that the target lesion is suitable for both randomized treatment strategies, participants will be randomly assigned to undergo either SCB treatment without routine stent implantation or planned SES implantation. In the SCB group, bail-out SES implantation will be performed when clinically necessary, such as in cases of significant residual stenosis or flow-limiting dissection. Participants will undergo angiographic and IVUS follow-up at 9 months, and clinical outcomes will be assessed through 12 months.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Aged ≥18 years.

Diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), including unstable angina (UA), non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), or ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The diagnosis, classification, and clinical management of ACS will follow the 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes. NSTEMI and STEMI will be diagnosed according to the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction.

A de novo lesion in a large native coronary artery with a target lesion reference vessel diameter ≥2.75 mm.

Only one target lesion is considered to require intervention and is suitable for treatment with a sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB), with bail-out stenting if necessary, or with a sirolimus-eluting stent (SES).

Disqualifiers

Acute heart failure, acute cardiogenic shock, or persistent hemodynamic instability.

Percutaneous coronary intervention within the previous 12 months, including stent implantation, balloon angioplasty, or SCB treatment.

A bifurcation lesion requiring simultaneous intervention of both the main vessel and side branch.

In-stent restenosis in the target vessel; only de novo lesions are eligible for this study.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • IVUS-Guided Sirolimus-Coated Balloon

    Device

    Following adequate lesion preparation and confirmation of feasibility via IVUS assessment, the SCB will be used for dilation to achieve drug delivery without routine stent implantation. In cases of significant residual stenosis or flow-limiting dissection, bail-out SES implantation will be performed. Post-procedure antithrombotic therapy and follow-up will be managed according to guideline recommendations and at the discretion of the clinician.

  • IVUS-Guided Sirolimus-Eluting Stent

    Device

    Following successful lesion preparation, the SES will be implanted under IVUS guidance to optimize stent expansion and apposition. Post-procedure antithrombotic therapy and follow-up will be managed according to guideline recommendations and at the discretion of the clinician.

Treatment groups

150 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: IVUS-Guided Sirolimus-Coated BalloonExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: IVUS-Guided Sirolimus-Eluting StentActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

In-Segment Late Lumen Loss at 9 Months

In-segment late lumen loss (LLL) of the target lesion is calculated as the in-segment minimal lumen diameter (MLD) measured immediately after the index procedure minus the in-segment MLD measured at 9-month follow-up, assessed by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) by an independent angiographic core laboratory. The in-segment analysis region comprises the device-treated segment plus the 5 mm proximal and 5 mm distal edge segments. A negative value indicates lumen enlargement relative to the immediate post-procedural result. The mean value will be reported.

Time frame
9 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Periprocedural Complications

A composite of cardiovascular death, periprocedural myocardial infarction, acute target lesion or target vessel thrombosis, and acute target lesion or target vessel occlusion occurring within 48 hours after the procedure.

Time frame
Within 48 hours after the procedure
2

Target Lesion Failure (TLF)

a composite of cardiovascular death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR).

Time frame
12 months
3

Patient-oriented Composite Endpoint (PoCE)

a composite of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, any stroke, and any revascularization

Time frame
12 months
4

Bleeding Events

assessed according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 2-5 criteria.

Time frame
12 months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases

Lead sponsor

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital

Sponsor institution

B. Braun Medical International Trading Company Ltd.

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: