About this trial
This proposal responds to NIMH Objective 4.2.c to develop "decision-support tools and technologies that increase the effectiveness and continuous improvement of mental health interventions" by leveraging the Family First Prevention Services Act (FFPSA) policy opportunity. First, a web-based platform to host (a) a decision-support tool and (b) automated facilitation for group decisions with the tool will be developed with state partners' feedback. Next, decision makers leading their states' FFPSA quality improvement efforts will be engaged to pilot a decision-support intervention comprised of the tool and live or automated facilitation, and to evaluate the implementation quality of evidence-based programs adopted with the decision-support intervention.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
Non-institutionalized
Adults (18 years or older).
English-Speaking
Involved in initial state decision-making related to Family First Prevention Services Act.
Disqualifiers
None
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Optimizing Responses with Collaborative Assessments-Automated (ORCA-A)
BehavioralParticipants will receive automated facilitation in the ORCA platform. This will entail prompts for group discussion based on group model building scripts and decision hygiene approaches proposed by Kahneman, Sibony, and Sunstein (2021). Participants will have the option of using these prompts to discuss ORCA results in group decision discussions. Optimizing Responses with Collaborative Assessments (ORCA) is a technical decision support tool based in multi-criteria decision analysis. Decision makers rate and compare evidence-based programs or other practices with ORCA, then prioritize practices for local implementation based on ORCA results. ORCA will be on a virtual platform to allow for web-based completion, automated analysis, and automated facilitation.
Optimizing Responses with Collaborative Assessments-Live (ORCA-L)
BehavioralA facilitator will guide group decision discussions using group model building scripts and decision hygiene approaches proposed by Kahneman, Sibony, and Sunstein (2021). Facilitation will be either in-person or virtual, but occur "live" as in during real-time. Optimizing Responses with Collaborative Assessments (ORCA) is a technical decision support tool based in multi-criteria decision analysis. Decision makers rate and compare evidence-based programs or other practices with ORCA, then prioritize practices for local implementation based on ORCA results. ORCA will be on a virtual platform to allow for web-based completion, automated analysis, and automated facilitation.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Mean changes in decision assumptions, decision goals Pre and Immediately Post-intervention
A two-item, quantitative measure will inquire about assumptions and goals in the decision to adopt an intervention. This uses a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). This outcome is part of Aim 2b: Decision quality based on intervention fit to local context.
Mean changes in decision experience quality pre-post intervention
This will be measured across five validated, quantitative sub-scales from a measure of community partnered research: Partner Values, Synergy, Conflict and Cooperation, Participation, Participatory decision-making. Each scale has a range of 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree).
Mean changes in decision commitment pre-post intervention
A two-item, Likert-scale measure regarding the decision maker's confidence in and commitment to implementing the selected intervention(s) will be gathered using a two-item measure. This uses a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). These scales relate to Aim 2a: decision experience quality.
Mean changes in perceived potential community health impact pre-post intervention
This will be measured across a validated, quantitative sub-scale from a measure for community partnered research: Community Health Improvement. This scale has a range of 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). This is part of Aim 2b: Decision quality.
Secondary outcomes
Qualitative changes in decision reasoning pre- post-intervention
Group discussion transcripts will be analyzed using directed content analysis to identify themes. At baseline and post-intervention, a single-item, study-specific questionnaire will ask participants to express their rationale for adopting the selected intervention(s).
Qualitative changes in decision goals pre- post-intervention
Group discussion transcripts will be analyzed using directed content analysis to identify themes. At baseline and post-intervention, a single-item, study-specific questionnaire (the same as in Outcome 12) will ask participants to express their rationale for adopting the selected intervention(s).
Qualitative changes in decision consensus pre- post-intervention
Group discussion transcripts will be analyzed using directed content analysis to identify themes. At baseline and post-intervention, a single-item, study-specific questionnaire (the same as in Outcome 12) will ask participants to express their rationale for adopting the selected intervention(s).
Time to adoption or re-adoption of interventions with ORCA
Days elapsed from completing ORCA initial time to official decision regarding adopting or re-adopting an intervention. This outcome relates to Aim 2a: decision process quality.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Chestnut Health Systems
Lead sponsor
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Collaborator