Laparoscopic or Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer(Stage IB3,IIA2)

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
Age21-70
SponsorObstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University

About this trial

The purpose of this study is to confirm whether there is a difference between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) in patient survival for Cervical Cancer (Stage IB3, IIA2).

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Clinical diagnosis of squamous carcinoma of the cervix, adenocarcinoma, squamous adenocarcinoma (Stage IB3,IIA2).

Age ≥ 21 years and ≤ 70 years.

Surgery type B and C (refer to Q-M surgical staging)

Normal range of liver and kidney function and blood count (specific details below) Hemoglobin > 60g/L Platelets > 70*109/L Leukocytes > 3*109/L Creatinine < 50mg/dL Transaminase abnormal indicators ≤ 3 Maximum value of transaminases not exceeding 3 times the corresponding normal value.

Disqualifiers

Those who are contraindicated for various surgeries and cannot undergo surgery.

Patients who have received pelvic/abdominal radiotherapy irradiation or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for cervical cancer.

Patients with recurrent cervical cancer

Patients with CT, MRI or PET-CT suggesting suspicious metastasis of pelvic lymph nodes with maximum diameter >2cm after further improvement of preoperative examination.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Total Laparoscopic or Robotic Radical Hysterectomy

    Other intervention

    Radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection is performed as standard type C RH by Q-M classification, including cardinal ligaments divided at pelvic sidewall and uterosacral ligaments divided at near the sacral origin and the upper 1/4 to 1/3 of the vagina.

  • Total Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy

    Other intervention

    Radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection is performed as standard type C RH by Q-M classification, including cardinal ligaments divided at pelvic sidewall and uterosacral ligaments divided at near the sacral origin and the upper 1/4 to 1/3 of the vagina.

Treatment groups

1,104 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: 1Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: 2Active comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

the rate of OS at 5 years

Compare between groups(Cox proportional hazards model will be used to estimate the hazard ratio and 95% CI for the effect of treatment on the 5-year OS rate.)

Time frame
5 years from surgery

Secondary outcomes

1

the rate of PFS at 5 years

The curves of PFS at 5 years will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The logrank test will be used to test the above hypothesis, the 5-year PFS rate difference and its 95% confidence interval (CI) for the comparison between the two groups will be estimated.

Time frame
5 years from surgery

Other outcomes

1

Analysis of continuous outcomes

Compare these between groups(The continuous outcomes include operative duration(min), anesthesia time(min), blood loss during operation(ml), postoperative pain score and postoperative hospital stay(day). The outcomes with normal distribution will be summarised using mean and standard deviation (SD), while the outcomes with non-normal distribution will be summarised using median and interquartile. The differences in the outcomes and 95% CIs will be analysed by generalised linear model (GLM) with treatment as fixed effect and with normal distribution and identity link function.)

Time frame
1 years from surgery
2

Analysis of binary outcomes

Compare these between groups(The intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, one-month and one-year postoperative quality of life and sexual life will be treated as binary outcomes and will be summarised by number (%) of participants with the event. The differences in the outcomes and 95% CIs will be analysed by GLM with treatment as fixed effect and with binomial distribution and identity link function.)

Time frame
5 years from surgery
3

Safety analysis

Adverse events (AEs) will be summarised using the number of AEs, the number (%) of participants with AEs by groups.

Time frame
5 years from surgery

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University

Lead sponsor

Children's Hospital of Fudan University

Collaborator

Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

Collaborator

Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

Collaborator

RenJi Hospital

Collaborator

Taizhou Hospital, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences

Collaborator

First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University

Collaborator