Large Language Models Versus Anesthesiologists for ASA Physical Status Classification

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorMarmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital

About this trial

The American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) classification is a cornerstone of preoperative risk assessment, yet interrater variability among clinicians is well documented. Large language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated expert-level performance in several clinical classification tasks, including ASA-PS assignment.

This retrospective observational study evaluates whether four widely used LLMs - ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Gemini, and Claude - can accurately and consistently assign ASA-PS classes from structured, fully anonymized clinical vignettes derived from real preoperative anesthesia evaluations, using a consensus of senior anesthesiologists as the reference standard.

No patient data will be transmitted to third-party platforms. Clinical information will be converted by the investigators into de-identified structured vignettes containing only age range, sex, body mass index range, presence or absence of systemic diseases, functional capacity, and the major/minor nature of the planned surgery, in full compliance with national data protection legislation (KVKK).

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age 18 years or older

Planned elective surgery

Completed preoperative anesthesia evaluation

Disqualifiers

Emergency surgical procedures

ASA VI (brain death)

Incomplete clinical records

Trial population

Adult patients who underwent preoperative anesthesia evaluation before elective surgery at a tertiary university hospital in Istanbul, Turkey.

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Retrospective

Treatments tested in this trial

Not listed

Trial groups

350 Participants
are grouped into 1 trial group
Group A: elective surgery patients

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Agreement between LLM-assigned and reference-standard ASA-PS class

Quadratic weighted Cohen's kappa between each large language model's ASA-PS assignment (ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Gemini, Claude) and the reference standard defined by consensus of a blinded panel of at least three senior anesthesiologists. Agreement of at least "good" level (weighted kappa ≥ 0.60) is hypothesized.

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of 3 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Overall classification accuracy of each LLM

Proportion of vignettes in which the LLM-assigned ASA-PS class exactly matches the reference standard, with exploratory pairwise comparisons among the four models (McNemar/permutation tests, corrected for multiple comparisons)

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
2

Subgroup error patterns

Frequency and direction (over- vs. under-classification) of LLM misclassifications in prespecified subgroups: ASA III-IV boundary, multimorbidity, major vs. minor surgery

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of 3 months

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: