About this trial
This pilot randomised controlled trial aims to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of an intervention program promoting Mental Health Literacy. A 10-week group treatment, 90 minutes each session, for adults and older adults with Chronic Pain. Half of the participants will receive the intervention immediately (experimental group), while the other half will not receive it initially. Still, they will receive it after the main phase of the study is completed (control group in waiting list). The intervention focuses on increasing Mental Health Literacy and reducing maladaptive beliefs and behaviours associated with pain. It also explores mechanisms and moderators of change.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Adults (18 to 64 years old) and seniors (65 years old or older) residing in Portugal.
Previous diagnosis of Chronic Pain carried out by a doctor.
Availability to attend sessions.
Disqualifiers
Active neoplasia.
Inability to give informed consent (e.g. due to dementia).
Currently receiving psychological support regularly (sessions > once per semester).
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Mental Health Literacy Promotion Intervention Program
Behavioral10 sessions, 90 minutes each, weekly. A face-to-face group treatment for Chronic Pain that focuses on enhancing individuals' understanding of mental health issues, promoting help-seeking behaviors, and reducing stigma associated with mental illness. Intervention includes group discussions, audio-visual material and written material.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
change from Mental Health Literacy Scale
Mental Health Literacy - higher scores mean more Mental Health Literacy. Minimum value: 35 Maximum value: 160
change from Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Pain Catastrophizing - higher scores mean more catastrophizing thoughts are present. Minimum value: 0 Maximum value: 52
change from Brief Pain Inventory - intensity and interference
Pain intensity and interference - higher scores mean more perceived pain severity and interference. Minimum value: 0 Maximum value: 10
Secondary outcomes
change from World Health Organization Quality of Life - Spirituality, Religiousness and Personal Beliefs - Bref
Quality of Life Spiritual, Religious and Personal Beliefs - higher scores mean a more positive perception of quality of life in the dimensions of spirituality, religiosity and personal beliefs. Minimum value: 9 Maximum value: 45
change from Positive and Negative Affect Schedule
Positive and Negative Affect - higher scores mean more attribution of positive or negative Affect, respectively. Minimum value (per subscale): 10 Maximum value (per subscale): 50
change from Satisfaction With Life Scale
Satisfaction With Life - higher scores mean more Satisfaction With Life. Minimum value: 5 Maximum value: 35
change from Brief Religious and Spiritual Coping Scale
Religious and spiritual coping strategies in response to stress and illness. * Positive Religious Coping Score (7-28): Higher scores indicate greater reliance on adaptive spiritual coping. * Negative Religious Coping Score (7-21): Higher scores reflect significant spiritual struggle and maladaptive coping.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: