Leveraging Adult Protective Service Interaction to Offer Evidence-Based Treatment for Depression in Elder Neglect/Self Neglect

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age65+
SponsorThe University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

About this trial

The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility and acceptability of an evidence-based treatment for depression delivered over an ipad, computer, or smartphone can help Adult Protective Services (APS) clients with their activities of daily living to evaluate whether reductions on measures of depression and apathy (a) mediate reduced Elder Neglect/Self Neglect (EN/SN) behaviors; and (b) whether secondary posited mediating mechanisms are also active in impacting depression and apathy

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

APS Case in APS Region VI- Must have open case

PHQ 9 score- Must have score of nine (9) or more

Disqualifiers

Previous mental health diagnosis of bipolar disorder, psychotic disorders, and moderate to severe dementia

Assessment of Consent Proxy- Those who need assessment of consent proxy

Suicidal Intent (as indexed by PhQ-9 question 9)- Those scoring 2 or 3

Current Alcohol and Drug Dependency- As evidenced by Cut down, Annoyed, Guilty, and Eye-opener (CAGE) score of 3 or more

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • APS Treatment as Usual

    Behavioral

    APS agencies conduct in-home investigations of alleged abuse and neglect against disabled and older adults. Investigations result in short-term stop-gap measures, primarily brief case-management centering on referral linkage to community-based services and provision of resource allocation. No direct psychological services or treatments are provided by APS, however referral to other services is also standard.

  • Intervention-Behavioral Activation (BA)

    Behavioral

    Participants will be will be guided through 8 one-hour sessions via home telehealth by the study community health worker. Each weekly \< 60 minute BA session will include modules focusing on 1) Psychoeducation for depression and techniques for self-management, including pharmacologic and psychosocial treatment options; 2) Introduction of BA and guided problem-solving techniques to enhance self efficacy for managing depression and other chronic illnesses; 3) BA and problem-solving techniques to support medication management and adherence strategies; 4) BA to develop strategies and techniques for communicating with health providers and/or support resources to foster positive mood and self management; and 5) Developing a relapse prevention plan, which includes identifying triggers for lower functioning, support resources, and practice of BA techniques.

Treatment groups

50 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: APS Treatment as UsualActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Intervention-Behavioral Activation (BA)Experimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Change in depression as assessed by the Patient Depression Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

This is 9 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day), for a maximum score of 27, higher score indicating more depression

Time frame
baseline, post-treatment ( 8 weeks after baseline), and 3 months
2

Change in apathy as assessed by the Apathy Motivations Index (AMI)

This is an 18 item questionnaire and each item is scored on a scale from 0(completely true) to 4(completely untrue), for a maximum score of 72, with higher scores indicating greater apathy

Time frame
baseline, post-treatment ( 8 weeks after baseline), and 3 months
3

Change in Elder Neglect/Self Neglect (EN/SN) as evidenced by study developed goal attainment scale

Participants will be given a list of 19 common daily activities and will be asked to pick one or more activities form the list that they would like to start doing or do more regularly each day or week.Each activity will be then scored based on the following scoring criteria, higher score indicating better outcome : (Much less than expected)-2 (Somewhat less than expected)-1 (Expected client outcome)0 (Somewhat better than expected)+1 (Much better than expected)+2

Time frame
baseline, post-treatment ( 8 weeks after baseline), and 3 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Change in social connection as assessed by the Lubben Social Network Scale

This is a 6 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0(none) to 5(none or more contacts) for a total score range of 0-30 higher scores indicating better outcome

Time frame
baseline, post-treatment ( 8 weeks after baseline), and 3 months
2

Change in social isolation as assessed by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS 8)

This is an 8 item questionnaire and each is cored from 1(never) -5 (always) for a maximum score of 40, higher score indicating worse outcome

Time frame
baseline, post-treatment ( 8 weeks after baseline), and 3 months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Lead sponsor

National Institute on Aging (NIA)

Collaborator