About this trial
This study is being conducted to compare two medications, intravenous lidocaine and intravenous magnesium sulfate, and their ability to keep blood pressure and heart rate stable during the period of waking up from general anesthesia in infertility-related laparoscopic gynecologic surgeries.
Laparoscopic gynecologic procedures can cause changes in heart rate and blood pressure, especially during emergence from anesthesia, and these changes may affect patient safety.
In this randomized, double-blind clinical trial, women scheduled for elective infertility-related laparoscopic surgery will be assigned to one of three groups: lidocaine, magnesium sulfate, or a control group. The study will evaluate mean arterial pressure (primary outcome), heart rate, pain scores, sedation level, nausea and vomiting, and any side effects during and after surgery.
The goal is to determine which medication provides better hemodynamic stability and improves recovery in the early postoperative period.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
None
Disqualifiers
None
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Lidocaine (drug)
DrugThe intervention described in this clinical study involves a comparative prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial to assess the effects of intravenous Lidocaine versus Magnesium Sulfate compared to a Control group for hemodynamic stability during emergence from general anesthesia in infertility-related laparoscopic gynecologic surgeries.
Normal Saline (Intravenous)
Drug0.9% normal saline, total volume 15 mL, administered intravenously over 15 minutes starting 30 minutes before the anticipated time of extubation.
Lidocaine (drug)
DrugLidocaine 1.5 mg/kg diluted with 0.9% normal saline to a total volume of 15 mL, administered intravenously over 15 minutes starting 30 minutes before the anticipated time of extubation.
magnesium sulfate
DrugMagnesium sulfate 30 mg/kg diluted with 0.9% normal saline to a total volume of 15 mL, administered intravenously over 15 minutes starting 30 minutes before the anticipated time of extubation.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
the mean arterial pressure
MAP mean arterial pressure Measurement Schedule During Emergence MAP will be continuously monitored during the emergence phase of anesthesia. Recordings will be documented at minute 0 (the exact moment of extubation) and 5 minutes after extubation, starting from 5 minutes before extubation
Secondary outcomes
heart rate
HR heart rate serves as an important measure to determine how well the interventions (lidocaine or magnesium sulfate) manage hemodynamic stability during the delicate phase of emergence from anesthesia.
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain
Pain intensity assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a 10-cm scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
Ramsay Sedation Score
assess the sedation level in patients recovering from general anesthesia during the postoperative period.The Ramsey Sedation Score is a 6-point scale used to assess the depth of sedation in patients. The score is based on the patient's responsiveness to verbal commands and physical stimuli, which allows clinicians to monitor sedation levels effectively.
Incidence of Hypotension:
A decrease in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) by more than 20% from the baseline value
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: