Light Therapy and Occupational Therapy Fatigue Management-Based Intervention for Patients With Genitourinary Cancers

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorCity of Hope Medical Center

About this trial

This clinical trial evaluates light therapy and occupational therapy in improving cancer related fatigue (CRF) patients with genitourinary cancers. Light therapy is a non-pharmacological and evidence-based intervention for managing fatigue in cancer patients. The use of light therapy can provide a low burden, inexpensive, and easy to disseminate intervention approach that can potentially have a larger impact on CRF. In addition, occupational therapy is a standard, but often underutilized, component of the multi-disciplinary approach to cancer care. Using the combination of light therapy and occupational therapy may be effective in CRF management.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Aged 18 and over

Sufficiently fluent in English

On active treatment receiving systemic therapy (e.g., chemotherapy, immunotherapy, hormonal therapy, etc.) or radiotherapy

Patients with diagnosis of a genitourinary (GU) cancer (e.g., prostate, kidney, and bladder cancer) who have grade 1 or 2 fatigue based on physician assessment at the time of study entry

Disqualifiers

Severe sleep disorders (e.g. narcolepsy)

Eye Diseases which limit the ability of light to be processed (e.g. untreated cataracts, severe glaucoma, macular degeneration, blindness, pupil dilation problems or other retinal disorder)

Severe psychological impairment (e.g., bipolar disorder or manic episodes)

Current employment in night shift work

Trial design

Design model

Factorial

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Best Practice

    Other intervention

    Undergo routine treatment and usual follow up care

  • Bright White Light Therapy

    Device

    Undergo bright white therapy

  • Occupational Therapy

    Behavioral

    Undergo occupational therapy

  • Questionnaire Administration

    Other intervention

    Complete questionnaires

Treatment groups

224 Participants
are divided into 4 treatment groups
Group A: Arm I (BWL)Experimental treatment 2 interventions
Group B: Arm II (OT)Experimental treatment 2 interventions
Group C: Arm III (OT, BWL)Experimental treatment 3 interventions
Group D: Arm IV (Control)Active comparator 2 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - (FACIT)

The effects of light therapy and occupational therapy (OT) on FACIT will be evaluated by comparing light therapy to no-light therapy and comparing occupational therapy to no-occupational therapy. Analysis of variance test will be used for the factorial comparisons, with a two-sided statistical significance level (alpha = 0.05). The interaction between occupational therapy and light therapy will be explored (to understand whether the effect of light therapy \[if any\] on FACIT would change with occupational therapy and vice versa). The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT- fatigue scale) is a 13-item patient-reported measure of fatigue. Items are scored on a 0 - 4 response scale with anchors ranging from "Not at all" to "Very much so". To score the FACIT-fatigue, all items are summed to create a single fatigue score with a range from 0 to 52. The higher the score, the better the Quality of Life (QoL).

Time frame
At baseline
2

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - (FACIT)

The effects of light therapy and occupational therapy (OT) on FACIT will be evaluated by comparing light therapy to no-light therapy and comparing occupational therapy to no-occupational therapy. Analysis of variance test will be used for the factorial comparisons, with a two-sided statistical significance level (alpha = 0.05). The interaction between occupational therapy and light therapy will be explored (to understand whether the effect of light therapy \[if any\] on FACIT would change with occupational therapy and vice versa). The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT- fatigue scale) is a 13-item patient-reported measure of fatigue. Items are scored on a 0 - 4 response scale with anchors ranging from "Not at all" to "Very much so". To score the FACIT-fatigue, all items are summed to create a single fatigue score with a range from 0 to 52. The higher the score, the better the Quality of Life (QoL).

Time frame
6 weeks after baseline
3

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - (FACIT)

The effects of light therapy and occupational therapy (OT) on FACIT will be evaluated by comparing light therapy to no-light therapy and comparing occupational therapy to no-occupational therapy. Analysis of variance test will be used for the factorial comparisons, with a two-sided statistical significance level (alpha = 0.05). The interaction between occupational therapy and light therapy will be explored (to understand whether the effect of light therapy \[if any\] on FACIT would change with occupational therapy and vice versa). The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT- fatigue scale) is a 13-item patient-reported measure of fatigue. Items are scored on a 0 - 4 response scale with anchors ranging from "Not at all" to "Very much so". To score the FACIT-fatigue, all items are summed to create a single fatigue score with a range from 0 to 52. The higher the score, the better the Quality of Life (QoL).

Time frame
3 months after baseline

Secondary outcomes

1

Longitudinal change in FACIT-Fatigue scores

Will evaluate whether the longitudinal change in FACIT-Fatigue scores, is significantly different between the intervention groups, including the control group. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT- fatigue scale) is a 13-item patient-reported measure of fatigue. Items are scored on a 0 - 4 response scale with anchors ranging from "Not at all" to "Very much so". To score the FACIT-fatigue, all items are summed to create a single fatigue score with a range from 0 to 52. The higher the score, the better the QoL.

Time frame
Baseline
2

Longitudinal change in FACIT-Fatigue scores

Will evaluate whether the longitudinal change in FACIT-Fatigue scores, is significantly different between the intervention groups, including the control group. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT- fatigue scale) is a 13-item patient-reported measure of fatigue. Items are scored on a 0 - 4 response scale with anchors ranging from "Not at all" to "Very much so". To score the FACIT-fatigue, all items are summed to create a single fatigue score with a range from 0 to 52. The higher the score, the better the QoL.

Time frame
6 weeks after baseline
3

Longitudinal change in FACIT-Fatigue scores

Will evaluate whether the longitudinal change in FACIT-Fatigue scores, is significantly different between the intervention groups, including the control group. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT- fatigue scale) is a 13-item patient-reported measure of fatigue. Items are scored on a 0 - 4 response scale with anchors ranging from "Not at all" to "Very much so". To score the FACIT-fatigue, all items are summed to create a single fatigue score with a range from 0 to 52. The higher the score, the better the QoL.

Time frame
3 months after baseline
4

Self-reported occupational performance - Baseline

Will determine if an OT-based intervention can improve self-reported occupational performance from preassessment to immediately after time point 2 (session 6) This outcome measure is Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Its administration involves four steps: (a) the patient is asked to identify occupations that are difficult for him or her in self-care, productivity and leisure; (b) the importance of these problem occupations is rated on a scale of 1-10 in terms of importance (1 = least important, 10 = most important); (c) patients' perceptions of performance and satisfaction with their five most important problems are rated on two separate 10-point scales (performance 1 = not able to do it, 10 = able to do it extremely well; satisfaction 1 = not satisfied at all, 10 = extremely satisfied) and finally (d) at reassessment both the performance and satisfaction ratings are repeated (and the change between assessment and reassessment is evaluated).

Time frame
Baseline

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

City of Hope Medical Center

Lead sponsor

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Collaborator