Limiting Emergence Phenomena After General Anesthesia With Combined LMA and ETT Airway Management Technique

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorMilton S. Hershey Medical Center

About this trial

Emergence from general anesthesia with a laryngeal mask airway compared with an endotracheal tube has been shown to favorable with respect to limiting emergence phenomena such as coughing, straining, restlessness, and sympathetic stimulation leading to hypertension and tachycardia.

Many anesthesiologists would prefer the use of an ETT to an LMA in cases in which higher ventilation pressures may be required, in those patients who are perceived to be high risk for reflux and pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents, as well as during cases that allow the anesthesiologist to have little accessibility the airway.

The aim of this study is to investigate an airway management technique that would allow for the benefits of the ETT in terms of a secure airway for the duration of the surgical procedure as well the potential for less emergence phenomena seen when emerging with an LMA.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

ASA 1-3

Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery

Disqualifiers

Individuals who cannot provide consent

Individuals who would require translation services to provide consent

Prisoners

Parturients

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Induction of anesthesia
  • Placement of LMA [Ambu (R) AuraGain (TM) disposable laryngeal mask]
  • Laryngoscopy and placement of ETT
  • Ventilation via the ETT
  • Removal of the ETT
  • Intubation of the trachea through the LMA
  • Ventilation via the LMA
  • Emergence from anesthesia

Treatment groups

130 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators