About this trial
Osteotomies are among the oldest orthopedic treatments, in use for over 2000 years and still commonly employed. The basic principle involves making a bone cut to allow the realignment of the limb segment affected by deformity. Today, new knowledge and technologies, understanding of bone healing mechanisms, and the introduction of new fixation methods have made osteotomies one of the preferred treatments for early knee arthritis. They serve as an alternative to joint prosthesis implantation in young patients with medium to high functional demand.
Medial knee osteoarthritis is a pathology increasingly prevalent in today's population. The resulting varus deformity leads to a shift in the load axis on the medial tibial plateau. Osteotomy in this context becomes a therapeutic tool capable of restoring the correct mechanical axis of the lower limb and delaying or avoiding the progression of arthritis, thus avoiding the need for joint replacement.
The two most commonly used techniques are the Closing Wedge Lateral High Tibial Osteotomy (LCW-HTO) and the Opening Wedge Medial High Tibial Osteotomy (MOW-HTO), which are high tibial osteotomies in closure with a wedge removal and in opening with a wedge insertion, respectively.
The medium to long-term effects of this procedure, in terms of survival and modification of the tibial slope, have been extensively studied, as evidenced by the extensive literature on the subject. However, the effect of this intervention, in its two variants, on the progression of femoro-patellar arthritis and the height of the patella remains poorly investigated to date.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Diagnosis of medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (Outerbridge III-IV)
Follow-up > 60 months
Completeness of clinical and radiographic documentation.
Previous valgus osteotomy procedure (MOW-HTO or LCW-HTO)
Disqualifiers
Patients with previous injuries affecting the involved lower limb.
Patients with prior traumatic, septic, and rheumatoid arthritis.
Patients with previous alterations of the patellofemoral joint.
Patients with knee ligament injuries.
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
X-rays: load bearing inferior limbs, lateral knee, axial patella
Diagnostic testX-rays at 5 years follow-up minimum
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
patellar height
RX measurement of patellar height
femoral-patellar arthritis
RX evaluation of femoral-patellar arthritis
Secondary outcomes
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
KOOS assesses patient pain (9 items), other symptoms (7 items), function in daily living (17 items), function in sport and recreation (5 items), and knee related quality of life (4 items). Scores range from 0 to 100 with a score of 0 indicating the worst possible knee symptoms and 100 indicating no knee symptoms. The KOOS is a patient reported joint-specific score, which may be useful for assessing changes in knee pathology over time, with or without treatment.
Kujala score
Assessment of patellofemoral disorders: subjective symptoms and functional limitations.
Range of Motion
ROM expresses in degrees the degree of range of motion that a joint can perform along its full range of motion whether active or passive through an external aid.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.