Long-term Evaluation of Quality of Life and Aesthetic Outcomes After Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using the Profunda Artery Perforator (PAP) Flap

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexFemale
Age18+
SponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

About this trial

Breast reconstruction using autologous tissue is an important option for women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer. The profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap is a reliable alternative when abdominal tissue is unavailable or unsuitable for reconstruction. Although the PAP flap is increasingly used, limited data are available regarding long-term patient-reported quality of life, aesthetic outcomes, and donor-site morbidity.

This monocentric observational study aims to evaluate long-term quality of life in women who underwent breast reconstruction with a PAP flap at the European Georges Pompidou Hospital between 2014 and 2024. Participants will complete validated patient-reported outcome questionnaires (BREAST-Q Reconstruction Module and PROMIS-29) and undergo a standardized clinical and photographic assessment. Aesthetic outcomes will be evaluated using objective photographic analysis and blinded expert review.

The study will provide comprehensive information on patient satisfaction, functional outcomes, aesthetic results, and donor-site sequelae following PAP flap breast reconstruction.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Female patients aged 18 years or older.

History of unilateral or bilateral breast reconstruction using a profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap.

Breast reconstruction performed between 2014 and 2024 at the European Georges Pompidou Hospital.

Able to understand study procedures and complete study questionnaires.

Disqualifiers

Patients younger than 18 years.

Breast reconstruction performed using techniques other than PAP flap.

Breast reconstruction performed outside the study period (2014-2024).

Patients under legal protection measures.

Trial population

Women who underwent unilateral or bilateral breast reconstruction using a profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap after mastectomy for breast cancer at the European Georges Pompidou Hospital between 2014 and 2024 and who are eligible for long-term quality-of-life and aesthetic outcome assessment.

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Cross-sectional

Treatments tested in this trial

Not listed

Trial groups

264 Participants
are grouped into 1 trial group
Group A: PAP Flap Breast Reconstruction

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

BREAST-Q Reconstruction Module Domain Scores

Long-term patient-reported quality of life and satisfaction will be assessed using the BREAST-Q Reconstruction Module (French version). Domain scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, where 0 represents the poorest outcome and 100 the best outcome. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction and better health-related quality of life.

Time frame
At study assessment, at least 2 years after PAP flap breast reconstruction
2

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29-Item Profile (PROMIS-29 v2.1) Domain Scores

Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29-Item Profile (PROMIS-29 v2.1, French version). Scores are reported as standardized T-scores (population mean = 50, SD = 10; typical observed range approximately 20-80). Higher scores indicate better health for the Physical Function and Ability to Participate in Social Roles domains, whereas higher scores indicate worse symptoms for Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Pain Interference, and Pain Intensity domains.

Time frame
At study assessment, at least 2 years after PAP flap breast reconstruction

Secondary outcomes

1

Breast Cancer Conservation Treatment cosmetic results (BCCT.core) Aesthetic Classification

Aesthetic outcome will be evaluated using standardized clinical photographs analyzed with Breast Cancer Conservation Treatment cosmetic results (BCCT.core) software. Cosmetic results are classified into four categories: Excellent, Good, Fair, and Poor, with Excellent representing the best aesthetic outcome and Poor the worst aesthetic outcome.

Time frame
At study assessment, at least 2 years after PAP flap breast reconstruction
2

Blinded Expert Panel Aesthetic Score

Standardized photographs will be independently evaluated by blinded plastic surgeons and lay reviewers using a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS; range 0-10) and a 5-point Likert scale (range 1-5). Higher scores indicate a better aesthetic outcome.

Time frame
At study assessment, at least 2 years after PAP flap breast reconstruction
3

Breast Symmetry Assessment

Breast symmetry will be evaluated using objective photographic analysis and volumetric assessment when available. Greater symmetry (corresponding to smaller differences between reconstructed and contralateral breasts) indicates a better aesthetic outcome.

Time frame
At study assessment, at least 2 years after PAP flap breast reconstruction
4

Donor Site Morbidity

Assessment of donor-site sequelae and scar-related outcomes at the posterior thigh donor site.

Time frame
At study assessment, at least 2 years after PAP flap breast reconstruction

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: