About this trial
This study evaluates cancer-related weight and muscle mass loss, symptoms, and physical function (cachexia) in patients undergoing treatment for colorectal, lung, or pancreatic cancer that cannot be removed by surgery (unresectable) or is stage IV. Patients with these cancer types are at risk for developing cancer cachexia (CC), which is defined as weight loss, muscle loss, and fat loss due to cancer. CC has been associated with reduced physical performance, impaired quality of life, and poorer survival. Many studies that have evaluated treatments for cancer-related weight and muscle loss have aimed to treat all patients with weight loss exactly the same and, unfortunately, have not been successful. Like different cancer types, weight and muscle loss related to cancer may have different causes in different individuals and the best treatment strategy for this condition may not be a one-size-fits-all approach. Information gathered from this study may help researchers develop new diagnostic criteria for CC and design better treatments and clinical trials for cancer-related weight and muscle loss in the future to improve the quality of life in patients with advanced colorectal, lung, or pancreatic cancer.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Have a primary diagnosis of unresectable or stage IV 1) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 2) pancreatic adenocarcinoma, or 3) colorectal cancer
Note: Patients do not need to have cachexia to be eligible
Plan to start first-line systemic anti-cancer therapy (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, interventional clinical trial) in the next 6 weeks or has started first-line systemic therapy in the previous 6 weeks.
NOTE: Patients who received systemic anti-cancer therapy previously as part of adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment and have since recurred are still eligible if such treatment ended > 6 months prior to enrollment. Patients receiving concurrent radiation with systemic therapy or received local therapy alone (surgery, radiation therapy [RT]) prior to first line therapy remain eligible. Patients receiving maintenance treatment after first line therapy are not eligible
Disqualifiers
Have contraindications to physical function assessments (30-second arm curl, Timed-Up-And-Go test, or 30-second chair-stand test) per the treating provider or their designee
Have any planned major surgeries within the next 3 months
Have received chemotherapy or surgery for separate primary cancer within the past 3 years other than early local staged non-melanoma skin cancer
Be pregnant
Trial population
Patients undergoing treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), pancreatic adenocarcinoma, colorectal cancer.
Trial design
Cohort
Prospective
Treatments tested in this trial
Biospecimen Collection
Procedure/SurgeryUndergo collection of blood and archived tumor samples
Computed Tomography
Procedure/SurgeryUndergo CT or PET/CT scan
Electronic Health Record Review
Other interventionMedical records reviewed
Medical Device Usage and Evaluation
Other interventionWear actigraph
Physical Performance Testing
Other interventionUndergo physical function tests
Positron Emission Tomography
Procedure/SurgeryUndergo PET/CT scan
Survey Administration
Other interventionComplete surveys
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Identification of multiple distinct diagnostic subtypes within the syndrome of cancer cachexia (CC)
Defined by host characteristics (e.g. cachexia symptoms, physical activity, physical function, blood biomarkers including hemoglobin and albumin, and body composition) at baseline and change in these factors over time in patients with cancer at high risk for CC. First, will examine the distributions of each variable and assess the need for using transformations to achieve normality for continuous variables (log transformation, quartiles, or clinically important thresholds), collapsing similar variables into single categories, and excluding conditions that are too rare (\< 1% of the cohort). Next, will assess statistical correlations using the Jaccard similarity metric for binary variables and the Pearson or Spearman correlation for continuous variables to determine highly correlated variables that may provide redundant information.
Secondary outcomes
Association of each CC phenotype (clusters) with overall survival
Will be assessed in the Cox regression model. Will estimate the bivariate association where the only independent variables will be the indicators for the cluster membership. Will report the hazard ratio for the association of each CC phenotype, specifying the lowest-risk cluster as the reference. Will assess the influence of selected factors (e.g., age, performance status, and other known prognostic factors) on the association of the cluster with survival by adding the factor to the model as a covariate and keeping those that resulted in 10% or more change in any regression coefficients for cluster membership. Will assess if the association of clusters with survival varies by specific subgroups (e.g., older versus younger age, gender, and cancer type). Will assess the statistical significance interaction of the subgroup with the cluster membership by maximum likelihood test and evaluate the regression coefficients for clusters in each subgroup comparing the direction and magnitude.
Validation of CC diagnostic phenotypes developed in a separate, independent cachexia observational study performed by collaborators at Kaiser Permanente
Study participants will be categorized into the Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC)-derived CC phenotype groups. Will use the final latent class analysis model fit in the KPNC data to compute the posterior probabilities of membership in each latent class for each individual National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) participant based on his/her individual data. Will compare cluster prevalence in each cohort as well as the distributions of the variables used to determine each cluster to investigate patterns of commonality and dissimilarity across the contributing variables. Validation will be determined by fitting University of Rochester Cancer Center (URCC) NCORP participants in KPNC-derived clusters and evaluating each cluster's association with survival. If the ranking of survival (best to worst) among each cluster in the URCC NCORP dataset mirrors the prognostic ranking of clusters in the KPNC dataset, the clusters will be deemed validated.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
University of Rochester
Lead sponsor
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Collaborator