Low-Energy Ultrasound, Electrical and Magnetic Field Stimulation in Therapy-Resistant Myofascial Pain Syndrome

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-99
SponsorSobet AG

About this trial

Sonodyn is an investigational device that within this clinical investigation is intended for use in patients suffering from low back pain, tension headache or neck pain, originating from therapy-resistant myofascial pain syndrome.

Myofascial pain syndrome is a prevalent pain condition in the adult population and a common cause of pain and dysfunction in the musculoskeletal system. It is a trigger point-induced regional musculoskeletal pain disorder affecting one or more muscles or groups of muscles.

Sonodyn is a handheld medical device that combines low-energy ultrasound, electrical and magnetic field stimulation for non-invasive transcutaneous treatment of chronic myofascial pain syndrome. Sonodyn is a battery-operated, rechargeable stimulation device to be placed over specific trigger points for associated pain patterns in the human body. It emits ultrasound, electrical and magnetic stimulation signals with a pre-defined set of parameters for each of the independently operated power sources.

The study will follow a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind parallel group design. It will be conducted as a multi-center investigation at 6 sites in Austria and Switzerland. Patients are randomized in a 2:1 ratio into Treatment and Control.

* Active Sonodyn therapy (Treatment) * No therapy (Sham Control)

Two types of Sonodyn devices will be used: a fully functional one for Therapy arm patients that can deliver stimulation, and a non-functional one for Control arm patients that cannot convey any energy signals to the device output. The devices will look fully identical.

Randomization will be stratified by study site, pain diagnosis and sex of the patient.

For each subject, after a screening phase of 1 week, patients will be treated for 3 weeks with a follow-up of additional 8 weeks, adding up to 12 weeks. During treatment patients will activate their device 3 times a day for 10 minutes each.

During screening, treatment and follow-up period, all patients will twice per day report the average and maximum intensity of their pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Patients will also enter the date, amount, and time of intake of rescue medication, if applicable.

The primary objective of this study is to assess the impact on pain. Secondary objectives are to compare the performance between active therapy and sham, as well as to correlate changes in pain intensity with other pain related scales.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Male or female aged 18 to 99 years at screening

Patient has an understanding of the study and its procedures, agrees to its provisions, and gives written informed consent prior to any study-related procedures

low back pain

tension headache

Disqualifiers

Patients with active implants

Allergy against rescue medication used during the study

Pregnancy

Mental or physical impairments that represent a source of risk for handling the device

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Active Sonodyn

    Device

    Sonodyn emits ultrasound, electrical and magnetic stimulation signals with a pre-defined, fixed set of parameters for each of the independently operated power sources.

  • Sham

    Device

    Non-functional Sonodyn device that cannot convey any energy signals to the device output, however, looks and behaves fully identical as the active Sonodyn device.

Treatment groups

126 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Active Sonodyn Therapy (Treatment Group)Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Sham Therapy (Control Group)Sham comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Average Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

Change in Treatment group from Baseline to EoT in average Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst pain that the patient had ever experienced) per day

Time frame
3 weeks

Secondary outcomes

1

Difference in average NRS between groups - Baseline to EoT

Difference between groups in change of average NRS from Baseline to EoT

Time frame
3 weeks
2

Maximum NRS - Baseline to EoT

Change from Baseline to EoT in maximum NRS in both groups

Time frame
3 weeks
3

Average and maximum NRS - Baseline to end of follow-up

Change from Baseline to end of follow-up in average and maximum NRS in both groups

Time frame
11 weeks
4

AUC of average and maximum NRS - Baseline to EoT

Baseline-adjusted area under the curve (AUC) of average and maximum NRS from Baseline to EoT in both groups

Time frame
3 weeks

Other outcomes

1

Safety Outcome #1

Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Device Effects (ADEs), and Device Deficiencies (DDs) observed until EoT

Time frame
3 weeks
2

Safety Outcome #2

Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Serious Adverse Device Effects (SADEs), and related AEs observed until end of follow-up

Time frame
11 weeks

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Sobet AG

Lead sponsor

Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee

Collaborator

Krankenhaus der Elisabethinen Graz

Collaborator

Krankenhaus St. Vinzenz Zams

Collaborator

La Tour Hospital

Collaborator

Schmerzklinik Zürich

Collaborator

Salem-Spital Bern

Collaborator