Lymphoedema Diagnosis and Treatment
Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorFatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital
About this trial
A domain-specific, custom-trained large language model for the differential diagnosis and treatment planning of lymphedema, lipedema, and venous insufficiency.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Patients over the age of 18
Clinical diagnosis of lymphoedema
Clinical diagnosis of lipoedema
Clinical diagnosis of venous insufficiency
Disqualifiers
Lack of medical history
Lack of demographic data
Lack of clinical data and
Lack of imaging methods
Trial population
secondary lymphedema cases (post-pelvic surgery, post-breast cancer), primary lymphedema cases, lipedema cases (different types and stages), chronic venous insufficiency cases, mixed edema cases, and atypical presentations with diagnostic difficulties
Trial design
Design model
Case-only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Treatments tested in this trial
a domain-specific, custom-trained large language model for the differential diagnosis and treatment planning of lymphedema, lipedema, and venous insufficiency
Other interventionLymphedemaGPT was designed to analyze structured patient data to extract clinical summaries, present possible diagnoses with percentage probabilities, create differential diagnosis tables, suggest additional diagnostic tests, and generate evidence-based treatment plans.
Treatment groups
No treatment groups listed
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
1
Diagnostic accuracy rate
Percentage of cases where the primary diagnosis (most likely diagnosis) was correctly determined. The maximum percentage for each case was 100, and the minimum percentage was 0. Higher percentages mean a better outcome.
Time frame
1 hour2
Treatment adequacy rate
Percentage of treatment recommendations consistent with current guidelines. The maximum percentage for each case was 100, and the minimum percentage was 0. Higher percentages mean a better outcome.
Time frame
1 hour3
Average criterion score
Average Likert score of two evaluators for each criterion. The maximum score for each case was 40, and the minimum score was 8. higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame
1 hourSecondary outcomes
1
Overall performance score
Overall average of all criteria and cases. The maximum score for each case was 40, and the minimum score was 8. higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame
1 hourSponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: