Machine Learning for Predicting and Managing Quality of Life in Lung Cancer Immunotherapy Patients

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University

About this trial

The goal of this study is to explore whether health-related quality of life (HRQoL) can be used as a predictive indicator for lung cancer patients and to implement clinical interventions. The study addresses two main objectives:

Analyzing HRQoL data of lung cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy using machine learning clustering methods to explore data patterns and build an HRQoL early warning model (already developed).

Validating this HRQoL early warning model in real-world settings by classifying patients with different HRQoL characteristics and assessing the clinical value of the model

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Histologically diagnosed with lung cancer

Age over 18 years

Currently receiving immunotherapy for lung cancer

Good verbal communication ability

Disqualifiers

Cognitive impairment or mental illness

Other severe diseases

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Symptom cluster-based care intervention

    Behavioral

    The patient symptoms were surveyed to develop a symptom cluster care intervention plan. The specific steps were as follows: a research team was established, relevant literature was reviewed, and qualitative interviews were conducted. Guided by symptom management theory and the Knowledge-Attitude-Practice (KAP) behavior model, a draft of the care intervention was created. This draft was then refined through expert consultation to finalize the intervention plan.

  • Conventional care intervention

    Behavioral

    Standard nursing intervention. This refers to routine clinical care without a specific care plan tailored to the patient's symptoms. For example, if a patient has symptoms, the nurse assists the patient in notifying the doctor but does not provide any special treatment themselves

Treatment groups

200 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: The group with milder symptoms and better quality of lifePlacebo comparator 1 intervention
Group B: The group with more severe symptoms and poorer quality of lifeActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

EORTC QLQ C30

The EORTC QLQ-C30 (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30) is a tool used to assess the quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 30 items covering functioning, symptoms, and overall health status. Scores for each item range from 0 to 4 or 0 to 7 (depending on the item type), with overall scores typically ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better quality of life with fewer symptoms and better functioning, while lower scores reflect worse quality of life with more severe symptoms and poorer functioning.

Time frame
Two weeks after the intervention
2

EORTC QLQ LC-13

The EORTC QLQ LC-13 (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Lung Cancer Module 13) is a questionnaire used to assess the quality of life of lung cancer patients. It includes 13 items, with scores ranging from 0 to 4, and the total score ranges from 0 to 52. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms and poorer quality of life, while a lower score indicates better quality of life. The EORTC QLQ LC-13 is often used in conjunction with the EORTC QLQ-C30 scale, as they complement each other and provide a comprehensive assessment of the quality of life in lung cancer patients.

Time frame
Two weeks after the intervention

Secondary outcomes

1

ORR (Objective Response Rate)

ORR refers to the proportion of patients who achieve either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) during treatment. This endpoint reflects the effectiveness of the treatment in controlling the tumor. It is typically assessed through imaging techniques (e.g., CT, MRI) and scored based on RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) or similar criteria. ORR is a common efficacy endpoint in cancer clinical trials.

Time frame
Two weeks after the intervention
2

PFS (Progression-Free Survival)

PFS refers to the length of time from the start of treatment until the tumor progresses or the patient dies, typically assessed through imaging or clinical evaluation. This endpoint reflects the effectiveness of the treatment in delaying disease progression. PFS is particularly useful in evaluating the clinical efficacy of new drugs or therapies. An extension of PFS is usually considered a sign of effective treatment.

Time frame
Two weeks after the intervention

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Second Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University

Lead sponsor

Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: