MAINTAIN (Mucosal AblatIoN Therapy After INcretins)

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age21-65
SponsorDr. Christopher McGowan

About this trial

The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of gastric fundal mucosal ablation (GFMA) on weight trajectory following discontinuation of once-weekly semaglutide or tirzepatide in adults with obesity. In this study, GFMA will be performed on patients who have experienced \> 10% weight loss with GLP-1 therapy and who plan to discontinue use of GLP-1 medications for the duration of the study.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Subjects aged 21-65

Body mass Index (BMI) ≥30 kilograms per square meter (kg/m²), or ≤45 kg/m²

Observed ≥ 10% TBWL with semaglutide or tirzepatide use for primary obesity therapy

Subject did not experience >50% weight recurrence since discontinuation of semaglutide or tirzepatide

Disqualifiers

Known diagnosis of type I or type II diabetes or a Hemoglobin A1c > 6.5% at time of screening

Use of GLP-1 or GLP-1/GIP medication for the treatment of diabetes, rather than obesity.

Use of anticoagulation, antithrombotic agents, and/or NSAIDs that cannot be discontinued for a minimum of 12 weeks

Known bleeding diathesis that cannot be corrected through medical means.

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Gastric Fundal Mucosal Ablation (GFMA)

    Device

    Endoscopic Gastric Fundal Mucosal Ablation (GFMA) after discontinuation of GLP-1 therapy

Treatment groups

20 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Gastric Fundal Mucosal Ablation (GFMA) following discontinuation of GLP-1 therapyExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Percent Change in Total Body Weight Loss (TBWL) from Baseline

Measure percent change in total body weight over time following endoscopic GFMA. TBWL = pre-op weight - post op body weight. % TBWL is the fraction of body weight expressed in percentage term

Time frame
12 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Rate of Adverse Events (AE)

Occurrence of Adverse Events along with AE Type, severity, and relationship to treatment.

Time frame
Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 4, Month 6, Month 7, Month 8, Month 9, Month 10, Month 11, Month 12
2

Quality of Life Assessment

Baseline quality of life assessment scores compared to follow-up quality of life assessment scores. Quality of life score assessed and measured by the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite questionnaire. Scoring for the questionnaire ranges from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). Higher scores for the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-lite questionnaire indicates higher quality of life.

Time frame
1 Month, 2 Months, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months
3

Quality of Life Assessment

Baseline quality of life assessment scores compared to follow-up quality of life assessment scores. Quality of life score assessed and measured by the 36-Item Short Form Survey. Scoring for the questionnaire ranges from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). Higher scores on the 36-Item Short Form Survey questionnaire indicates higher quality of life.

Time frame
1 Month, 2 Months, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months
4

Appetite and Hunger Assessment

Baseline appetite and hunger assessment scores compared to follow-up appetite and hunger assessment scores. Appetite and hunger assessed and measured by the DAILY EATS questionnaire, which contains a numerical rating scale of 0-10 for each its 5 items. A higher score indicates greater hunger and appetite. A reduction in DAILY EATS score from baseline indicates a decrease in hunger and appetite levels, which is considered a positive outcome.

Time frame
Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Dr. Christopher McGowan

Lead sponsor

True You Weight Loss

Sponsor institution