About this trial
The MOP II study examines how to improve therapy for people struggling with a depressive disorder. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Short-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy (STPP) are two evidence-based treatments for depression that are widely used. Meta-analyses indicate that CBT and STPP are one average equally effective and superior to no treatment. However, many patients do not respond sufficiently and relapse rates after acute phase treatment are high.
Earlier research and theoretical insights suggest three promising strategies to enhance the effectiveness of psychotherapy. First, we want to examine whether increasing the frequency of the sessions will increase the effect of therapy. We want to compare once-weekly and twice-weekly sessions in both CBT and STPP to see whether more frequent sessions lead to better and more lasting reductions in depressive symptoms with the same total number of sessions.
Second, the study aims to answer what works for whom in two different psychotherapeutic approaches. People with depression differ in personality, life experiences, relationship styles, and how they understand the causes of their depression. Previous findings suggest that patients do better when the therapy approach matches how they see their problems. The MOP II study wants to replicate this finding.
Third, the study wants to examine how therapy leads to change. In CBT, improvement is thought to happen through changes in thinking patterns, such as fewer negative automatic thoughts and less rumination. In STPP, change is expected to come from better self-understanding, greater emotional awareness, and healthier ways of relating to others.
Consequently, the goal of the MOP II study is to find out whether more frequent therapy, better matching of patients to treatment type, and a clearer understanding of how therapy works can lead to faster improvement of depressive symptoms.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
age 18-65 years
Major Depressive Disorder Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) > 14.
Speak and understand a Scandinavian language
Willingness and ability to give informed consent.
Disqualifiers
Current or past neurological illness
Traumatic brain injury
Current alcohol and/or substance dependency disorders
Psychotic disorders
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Cognitive behavior therapy
BehavioralThe study explores cognitive behavior therapy and psychodynamic therapy
Psychodynamic therapy
BehavioralThe patients will receive psychodynamic therapy
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) is a clinician-rated questionnaire used to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Higher total scores indicate more severe depression.
The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
PHQ-9 is a 9-item scale that measures levels of depression. The PHQ-9 is a self assessment instrument and higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms
Secondary outcomes
General Anxiety Disorder
GAD-7 measures levels of anxiety using a 7-item scale. Higher scores indicate more anxiety
The Work And Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS)
WSAS is a five-item scale that assesses social and occupational functioning. Higher scores indicate poorer functioning
The Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form (PID-5-BF)-Adult
PID-5-BF contains 36 items and assesses pathological personality traits. Higher scores indicate stronger personality traits
The Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form (LPFS-BF)
LPFS-BF consists of 12 items and measures levels of maladaptive personality functioning. Higher scores indicate poorer personality functioning
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
University of Oslo
Lead sponsor
Oslo University Hospital
Sponsor institution
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: