Medium-term Effects of Treatments in Autoimmune Encephalitis

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
AgeNot listed
SponsorHospices Civils de Lyon

About this trial

Autoimmune encephalitides are severe neurological disorders requiring urgent treatment, even though there is no standard guideline by lack of empirical evidence. Commonly used treatments are divided into so-called first-line (steroids, intravenous immunoglobulins, plasma exchanges) and second-line (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, tocilizumab, others), and may be used in association or sequentially. There is no standard practice, and initial treatment protocol may consist in first-line alone, first-line with rituximab, or first-line with dual immunosuppression (rituximab and cyclophosphamide). Absence of clear response to initial treatment in the first 4 to 6 weeks may indicate undertreatment and is generally followed by treatment escalation, mostly to dual immunosuppression. However, as the frequency of non-responders to initial treatment is unknown, it is still unclear whether dual immunosuppression should be offered to all patients from inception.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Adult or child patient with encephalitis defined as anti-GAD, NMDAR, LGI1, CASPR2, IgLON5 or GFAP

Untreated or with a decision to treat within the previous 30 days.

Disqualifiers

None

Trial population

All Patients with autoimmune encephalitis defined anti-GAD NMDAR, LGI1, CASPR2, IgLON5 or GFAP and untreated within the previous 30 days

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

  • We aim to assess the clinical response to the treatment initiation protocols most commonly used in autoimmune encephalitis (first-line, first-line with rituximab, dual immunosuppression).

    Other intervention

    The patients will be identified via the French Nationwide Multidisciplinary Team Meetings for Autoimmune encephalitis, which are conducted on a bi-monthly basis. All patients with newly diagnosed NMDAR, LGI1, CASPR2, IgLON5, GFAP or GAD65 encephalitis and treated for less than 8 weeks will be included. Treatment protocols at the initiation of therapy will be stratified into: 1) first-line only; 2) rituximab without cyclophosphamide; 3) rituximab combined with cyclophosphamide; 4) others. The referral clinicians will be contacted by email and the data will be collected using standardized questionnaires, which will be sent at baseline (visit 1, V1) and 4 months after the initiation of therapy (visit 2, V2). The questionnaires will be structured into 7 sections: * 1 Demographics * 2 Symptoms * 3 Cognitive screening tests (MMSE, MoCA, and/or others) * 4 Level of dependence (ADL, I-ADL, mRS, CASE) and impact on social life * 5 Diagnostic tests (brain MRI, brain PET, CSF, and EEG findings)

Treatment groups

200 Participants
are divided into 6 treatment groups

6

Treatment groups

See each treatment group below.

Group A: group 1 : Patients with NMDAR encephalitis1 intervention
Group B: group 2 : Patients with GAD encephalitis1 intervention
Group C: group 3 : Patients with LGI1 encephalitis1 intervention
Group D: group 4 : Patients with IgLON5 encephalitis1 intervention
Group E: group 5 : Patients with GFAP encephalitis1 intervention
Group F: group 6 : Patients with CASPR2 encephalitis1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Failure of the initial treatment protocol

Failure of the initial treatment protocol, reflected by the decision to escalate treatment between V1 and V2. Treatment escalation is defined as the addition of one or more second-line treatments more than 30 days after the start of the initial treatment.

Time frame
At baseline and 4 months after the initiation of therapy

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.