Mental Health Literacy and Academic Performance

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age14-18
SponsorUniversity of Bucharest

About this trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to test the effectiveness of an intervention designed to promote mental health literacy in adolescents. The main questions it aims to answer are:

1. Whether this intervention can have an impact on mental health 2. Whether this intervention can have an impact on fostering academic performance, particularly in disadvantaged students (i.e., academic resilience) 3. Whether this intervention will have differential effectiveness as a function of the delivery format (psychoeducational materials only versus blended)

Participants will receive either an online, automated intervention consisting of psychoeducational materials delivered at predetermined intervals (automated), or the same but with the addition of synchronous or asynchronous psychoeducational sessions held by a licensed psychologist (i.e., blended).

These two conditions will also be compared to a Waitlist, to test if the interventions perform better than no treatment.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Enrolled in High School

Disqualifiers

Younger than 14 or older than 18

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Automated Intervention

    Behavioral

    Participants will receive 6 psychoeducational modules design to increase mental health literacy: Module 1: The Stigma of Mental Illness, Module 2: Understanding Mental Health and Mental Illness, Module 3: Information on Specific Mental Illnesses, Module 4: Experiences of Mental Illness, Module 5: Seeking Help and Finding Support, Module 6: The Importance of Positive Mental Health.

  • Blended Intervention

    Behavioral

    Participants will receive the same materials as the Automated Intervention, as well as the possibility to attend psychoeducational sessions held by licensed psychologists.

Treatment groups

264 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: Automated InterventionExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Blended InterventionExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group C: WaitlistNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Academic Performance - reading

Reading comprehension will be assessed with a standardized test for Romanian language, which were sourced from the pool of items from the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS). The test will consist of 26 items, with difficulties ranging from easy to difficult. Higher scores indicate greater academic performance.

Time frame
up to 3 months
2

Academic Performance - mathematics

Performance in mathematics will be assessed with a standardized test, sourced from the TIMSS, a platform specializing in standardized educational assessment in Romania. The test will consist of 26 items, with difficulties ranging from easy to difficult. Higher scores indicate greater academic performance.

Time frame
up to 3 months
3

Depressive symptomatology

The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Depression Scale (PHQ-A, Johnson et al., 2002) is the adolescent-adapted version of the Patient Health Questionnaire and contains ten items. Scores range from 0 to 30 and a higher score is representative of a worse outcome.

Time frame
up to 3 months
4

Anxiety symptomatology

The Anxiety Rating scale (Spitzer et al., 2011) consists of eight items, with scores ranging from 0 to 24 and higher scores indicate a worse outcome.

Time frame
up to 3 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Social anxiety symptomatology

The Severity Measure for Social Anxiety Disorder (SMSAD 11-17) is a ten-item instrument for children and adolescents (Carlton et al., 2022), with scores ranging from 0 to 50, with higher scores being indicative of a worse outcome.

Time frame
up to 3 months
2

Posttraumatic stress symptomatology

Posttraumatic Stress The Post Traumatic Symptom scale (Nedelcea et al., 2022) consists of 37 items. The first part of the scale presents a series of 17 stressful situations and participants are asked to indicate whether they have been exposed to one or more of these events in their lifetime. The last 20 items refer to the individual's reaction after experiencing a stressful situation. Scores range from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.

Time frame
up to 3 months
3

Eating Disorder symptomatology

The NEDA Eating Disorder Screening Tool (Fitzsimmons-Craft et al., 2019) is composed of 14 items. The first 11 items address different aspects of eating behavior and/or self-image. These contain multiple response options, with participants being guided to choose the one that suits them. The last three items refer to information about height, lowest weight in the last year and current weight. Higher scores indicate higher symptomatology.

Time frame
up to 3 months
4

Perceived social support

The Perceived Social Support Questionnaire (Kliem et al., 2015) contains six items, measured on a five-point Likert-type scale, where 1 = Does not fit me at all and 5 = Fits me extremely well. Scores range from 6 to 30, with higher scores indicative of a better outcome.

Time frame
up to 3 months

Other outcomes

1

Help seeking

The Attitudes Toward Seeking Professional Psychological Help - Short Form (Fischer \& Farina, 1995) instrument assesses attitudes towards seeking specialized psychological help. It consists of ten items and participants are asked to express the extent to which they agree with the statements. Scores range from 0 to 30 and higher scores are indicative of a better outcome.

Time frame
up to 3 months
2

Mental health stigma

The Peer Mental Health Stigmatization Scale (McKeague et al., 2015) assesses stigmatizing attitudes of people experiencing mental health problems. It is composed of 24 items and participants are asked to express the extent to which they agree with the items. cores range from 0 to 96, with higher scores being indicative of a better outcome.

Time frame
up to 3 months
3

Bullying

Bullying will assessed with the six items used in the World Mental Health Initiative. The items refer to times when someone is intentionally hurt or scared by a peer in the school setting, on the internet and in close relationships. Scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicative of a worse outcome.

Time frame
up to 3 months
4

Social media engagement

Social Media engagement will be measured with the Social Media Engagement Questionnaire (SMEQ; Przybylski et al., 2013). The questionnaire contains 5 items measured on an 8-point Likert scale (0 = not one day; 7 = every day). Higher scores represent higher engagement with social media. Scores range from 0 to 35, with higher scores indicative of a worse outcome.

Time frame
up to 3 months

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.