About this trial
This clinical research study is intended to show that Micro-Ultrasound Guided Focal Laser Ablation (MicroUSgFLA) is a safe procedure that can significantly postpone or eliminate the need for patients with intermediate-Risk prostate cancer (PCa) to undergo a definitive treatment (i.e., Radical Prostatectomy or Radiation Therapy) for their disease.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Men 40-80 years of age.
Histologically-proven intermediate-risk PCa (Gleason score 7, primary grade ≤ 4).
PCa clinical stage T1c or T2.
MRI/MicroUS site suspicious for cancer or cancer mapped to one prostate lobe.
Disqualifiers
Maximum dimension of MRI/MicroUS visible tumour > 15 mm.
Patients medically unfit for focal therapy of the prostate.
Patients who are unwilling or unable to give informed consent.
Patients who have received androgen suppression therapy.
Trial design
Single group
Treatments tested in this trial
6 month, prospective, interventional single-arm safety and effectiveness study
Procedure/Surgeryx
The TRANBERG|CLS Thermal therapy
DeviceMicro Ultrasound Guided Focal Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer by The Diode Laser System - The TRANBERGCLS\|Thermal Therapy
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Primary Outcome 1:
Number of Participants With Procedure-Related Adverse Events Time Frame: Up to 6 months after procedure Outcome Type: Safety Measure Description: Number and severity of procedure-related adverse events (AEs), graded according to CTCAE v5.0, to evaluate the safety profile of focal Micro-Ultrasound-Guided Focal Laser Ablation (MicroUS-gFLA) in patients with organ-confined intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Unit of Measure: Number of participants
Primary Outcome 2: Technical Success Rate of MicroUS-gFLA
Primary Outcome 2: Technical Success Rate of MicroUS-gFLA Time Frame: At completion of procedure; confirmed during follow-up up to 6 months Outcome Type: Feasibility Measure Description: Proportion of procedures achieving technical success, defined as: successful visualization and MicroUS-guided trocar insertion into the target lesion, and completion of focal laser ablation exactly as planned, as confirmed by intra-procedural imaging and follow-up mpMRI and/or biopsy. Unit of Measure: Percentage of procedures
Secondary outcomes
Secondary Outcome 1 - Change in PSA Level From Baseline
Secondary Outcome 1 - Change in PSA Level From Baseline Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months Outcome Type: Efficacy Measure Description: Change in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level from baseline prior to ablation to 6-month follow-up. Unit of Measure: Change in PSA (ng/mL)
Secondary Outcome 2: Change in Urinary Function (IPSS Score)
Secondary Outcome 2: Change in Urinary Function (IPSS Score) Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months Outcome Type: Functional Measure Description: Change in urinary function measured using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Unit of Measure: Change in score (IPSS scale)
Secondary Outcome 3: Change in Erectile Function (IIEF-15 Score)
Secondary Outcome 3: Change in Erectile Function (IIEF-15 Score) Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months Outcome Type: Functional Measure Description: Change in erectile function measured using the International Index of Erectile Function-15 (IIEF-15) questionnaire. Unit of Measure: Change in score (IIEF-15 scale)
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
University Health Network, Toronto
Lead sponsor
Exact Imaging
Collaborator
Clinical Laserthermia Systems AB
Collaborator