Minimal-Incision Technique With Modified Tracking Pin Placement Versus Standard Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorHallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital

About this trial

This randomized controlled trial will compare a minimal-incision and soft-tissue-preserving (MISI) technique with the standard surgical technique in patients undergoing robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis. A total of 100 participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either the MISI technique, which uses a reduced skin incision, limited soft-tissue dissection, and modified tracking pin placement, or the standard technique. The primary outcome is postoperative scar assessment at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include incision length, wound oozing, thigh pain and tenderness, recovery of straight-leg raising, tracking pin-related complications, patellar height, patient-reported scar assessments, and functional outcomes during follow-up.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Adults aged 18 years or older

Degenerative knee osteoarthritis requiring robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty

Body mass index below 30 kg/m²

Preoperative knee flexion of 90 degrees or greater

Disqualifiers

Skin lesions or conditions that may adversely affect wound healing

Previous intra-articular surgery of the affected knee

Inflammatory arthritis, including rheumatoid arthritis

Severe hepatic or renal disease associated with poor general health

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • MISI Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty
  • Standard Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Treatment groups

100 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups