About this trial
This clinical trial studies how well minimally invasive approaches (an artificial intelligence \[AI\] powered risk tool, nurse navigation, and a sponge on a string \[SOS\] test) work in diagnosing patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal cancer. Esophageal cancer has a poor 5-year survival rate when diagnosed after onset of symptoms. While rising, incidence of esophageal cancer remains too low to screen the entire population. BE is a condition in which the cells lining the lower part of the esophagus have changed or been replaced with abnormal cells that could lead to esophageal cancer. Currently, patients are screened for BE based on certain risk factors (reflux, age \> 50 years, White race, family history of esophageal cancer, obesity, male sex, and smoking), followed by endoscopies and surgery for treatment. These standard procedures may result in under-recognition of BE risk due to inaccurate and difficult to use risk assessment tools, high cost, invasiveness, low access to endoscopy, and sub-optimal recognition of abnormal cells during routing endoscopy. An AI powered risk tool that integrates symptoms, health history, and laboratory values from electronic health record data may more accurately assess BE and esophageal cancer risk that manual assessment. The BE-SOS screening test combines a swallowable cell collection device with assessment of DNA, which may more accurately diagnose abnormal cells. Nurse navigation involves trained personnel assisting individuals through the screening process and completing the follow-up diagnostic test if the screening test is positive. Navigators address cultural, social, access, and logistical barriers to screening. Nurse navigation may increase completion rates of diagnostic procedures following a positive screening test. These minimally invasive approaches may enable higher rates of BE screening than currently being accomplished.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
SPECIFIC AIM 1A: Adult patients 18-85 years old
SPECIFIC AIM 1A INTERVENTION CLUSTERS: BE Risk Tool Score > 0.087, indicating a higher risk for BE/esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). This will be run as a web-based application integrating data from several domains in the electronic health record (EPIC). Output score will range from 0-1.
SPECIFIC AIM 1A CONTROL CLUSTERS: Meeting American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) screening criteria (gastroesophageal reflux disease [GERD]+ > 2 BE risk factors: Age ≥ 50 years, Male sex, Caucasian race, obesity [body mass index (BMI) > 30], ever smoker, family history of BE/EAC)
SPECIFIC AIM 1B: A "low risk" BE risk tool score (< 0.0897)
Disqualifiers
SPECIFIC AIM 1A: History of Barrett's esophagus or esophageal adenocarcinoma
SPECIFIC AIM 1A: Prior endoscopy in the last 10 years
SPECIFIC AIM 1A: Patients who are unable to consent
SPECIFIC AIM 1A: Patients with a current history of uninvestigated dysphagia
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Cancer Screening
Other interventionUndergo BE-SOS test
Computer-Assisted Intervention
Other interventionUndergo BE risk assessment using AI powered BE Risk Tool
Endoscopic Procedure
Procedure/SurgeryUndergo endoscopy
Health Risk Assessment
BehavioralUndergo manual BE risk assessment
Navigation
Other interventionReceive RN navigation
Questionnaire Administration
Other interventionAncillary studies
Treatment groups
6
Treatment groupsSee each treatment group below.
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Rate of completed Barrett's esophagus (BE) screening
Assessed as the proportion of patients who complete BE screening. This is determined as the number of patients who complete a sponge on a string (SOS) BE screening test or endoscopy screen, divided by the number of screen eligible patients in each group.
Negative predictive value of the AI powered BE Risk Tool (Aim 1b)
A randomly selected sample of patients (N=50) with a negative BE risk tool score will undergo a research upper endoscopy to confirm the high estimated negative predicted value of the BE risk tool.
Secondary outcomes
BE screening ordered (completed + not completed)
Assessed as the proportion of patients who complete BE screening (SOS BE screen test or endoscopy) for patients where BE screening has been ordered.
Successful completion of the SOS BE screen test
Assessed as the number that had successful test completion (a test result was received) divided by the number of patients where a BE-SOS test/endoscopy order was placed
Completion of diagnostic endoscopy following a positive SOS BE screen test
Assessed as the proportion of patients who complete diagnostic endoscopy following a positive BE-SOS test.
Rates of BE [with or without dysplasia/esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC)]
The proportion of patients with BE/EAC diagnoses will be determined as the number with a BE/EAC diagnosis divided by the number of patients who underwent BE-SOS or endoscopy.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Mayo Clinic
Lead sponsor
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Collaborator
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: