Motor-Cognitive Training for Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age65+
SponsorUniversity of Kansas Medical Center

About this trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate if combined motor-cognitive training can improve motor and cognitive symptoms in older adults with motoric cognitive risk syndrome. The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Does motor-cognitive training using a virtual reality treadmill improve gait speed? * Does motor-cognitive training using a virtual reality treadmill improve cognitive functions?

Researchers will compare virtual reality treadmill training with treadmill training to see if virtual reality treadmill training works to improve motor and cognitive functions in older adults at risk of dementia

Participants will

* Complete 18 sessions (1 hour, 3x/week, 6 weeks) of either virtual reality treadmill training or treadmill training * Complete a pre- and post-training assessment * Wear an activity sensor for seven days prior to the pre-training assessment and for seven days after the post-training assessment.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age ≥ 65

English speaking

Normal cognition (CDR=0)

Meet MCR criteria

Disqualifiers

Major chronic unstable disease or neurological condition (e.g., seizures)

Diagnosed dementia

Active psychiatric conditions

Musculoskeletal conditions that affect walking for more than 2 minutes

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Virtual Reality Treadmill Training

    Behavioral

    The Virtual Reality Treadmill Training (VRTT) group will complete 18 training sessions over six weeks (three 1-hour sessions per week). Participants will perform prescribed tasks designed to challenge motor, cognitive, and motor-cognitive functions within a VR environment projected onto a screen in front of the treadmill (Fig 1). The VRTT system includes a conventional treadmill with a harness suspension system, camera-based motion capture (Intel RealSense, Santa Clara, CA), and a computer-generated simulation (GaitBetter, Tel Aviv, Israel). The camera tracks the participant's feet movements, which are displayed within the VR environment, allowing participants to see their feet navigating obstacles, pathways, and narrow corridors. Each session will include three walking bouts interspersed with rest breaks, targeting at least 40 minutes of active motor-cognitive training.

  • Treadmill Training

    Behavioral

    Participants in the Treadmill Training (TT) intervention will follow a traditional TT program without feedback from the VR system. 70 The focus will be on increasing gait speed and distance, with no motor-cognitive training such as obstacle crossing or cognitive tasks while walking.

Treatment groups

30 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Virtual Reality Treadmill TrainingExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Treadmill TrainingActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Dual-task gait speed

6 minute walk test on a 25-meter walkway while completing auditory oddball task

Time frame
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
2

Cognition

Uniform Data Set (UDS) 4.0 global cognition composite score

Time frame
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
3

Gait speed

Gait speed on 4-meter walk test (4MWT)

Time frame
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
4

Cognitive complaints

Self-report of cognitive complaints based on memory item of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): yes - no

Time frame
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

1

Dual task cost

Motor and cognitive dual task cost defined using ((dual task - single task) / single task) \* 100

Time frame
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
2

Spatiotemporal gait characteristics

Inertial Motion Units will collect spatiotemporal gait characteristics during single-task and dual-task walking

Time frame
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
3

Cognitive domain scores

Uniform Data Set 4.0 (UDS) cognitive domain scores

Time frame
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
4

P3 event-related potential (ERP)

P3 event-related potential (ERP) extracted from electroencephalography during oddball test

Time frame
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks

Other outcomes

1

Real-world physical activity and gait data

Physical activity and gait data collected from activity sensors

Time frame
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
2

Depression

Scores on the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): range 0 - 15; higher score is worse

Time frame
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
3

Health-related Quality of life

Scores on Short Form 36 (SF-36): range 0 - 100; higher score is better

Time frame
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
4

Frailty

Scores on the Evaluative Frailty Index for Physical Activity (EFIPA): range 0 - 1; higher score is worse

Time frame
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

University of Kansas Medical Center

Lead sponsor

National Institute on Aging (NIA)

Collaborator