Mouthpiece With Integrated Cheek Support vs. Manual Cheek Support During Respiratory Oscillometry

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age5-75
SponsorPolitecnico di Milano

About this trial

The study aims to evaluate the measurement accuracy of respiratory impedance during oscillometry (or Forced Oscillation Technique - FOT) under the following conditions: 1)The subject's cheeks are manually supported by an expert (Gold Standard method), 2) The subject's cheeks are supported by an integrated cheek support in the mouthpiece.

It is a prospective, randomized, cross-over study on Subjects who will present themselves at the offices of the participating doctors, aged between 5 and 75 years. The primary outcome is to Compare the respiratory impedance measurements under the two measurement conditions. Secondary Objectives are to: i)evaluate the patient's comfort during the measurement with the cheek support and compare this comfort to the gold standard condition; ii) assess the maximum and minimum face dimensions of the recruited subjects that allow for effective and comfortable cheek support; iii) evaluate the type and frequency of measurement errors introduced by the use of the integrated cheek support in the mouthpiece.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

subjects aged between 5 and 75 years

Disqualifiers

Subjects unable to follow the study procedures or with any physical or mental condition deemed unsuitable by the doctor will be excluded from the study

Trial design

Design model

Crossover

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Mouthpiece with cheek-holder

    Device

    A cheek support integrated into the mouthpiece is used for the measures

Treatment groups

55 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: ControlNo intervention 0 interventions
Group B: Cheek HolderExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

impedance measurements

Compare the respiratory respiratory resistance (cmH2O\*s/L) and reactance (cmH2O\*s/L) at 5 Hz under the two measurement conditions

Time frame
within session (about 15 min)

Secondary outcomes

1

evaluate patient's comfort during the measurement with the cheek support

evaluate the patient's comfort during the measurement with the cheek support and compare this comfort to the gold standard condition as quantified by the questionnaire

Time frame
within session (about 15 min)
2

face dimensions allowing for effective and comfortable cheek support

assess the maximum and minimum face dimensions (to lip length and bigonial width) of the recruited subjects that allow for effective and comfortable cheek support as detailed in the Data Analysis section

Time frame
within session (about 15 min)
3

evaluate the type and frequency of measurement errors

evaluate the type and frequency of measurement errors introduced by the use of the integrated cheek support in the mouthpiece.

Time frame
within session (about 15 min)

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.