About this trial
Rationale: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamus is an effective surgical treatment for patients with disabling essential tremor, despite optimal pharmacological treatment. To date, the standard DBS procedure is performed under local anesthesia which is very burdensome for patients. It is now possible to directly visualize the target (motor) area in the thalamus due to advances in modern imaging techniques. DBS surgery could be performed under general anesthesia (asleep).
Objective: The primary objective of the study is to determine whether asleep thalamic DBS surgery provides an equal tremor reduction compared to awake thalamic DBS surgery, measured by the clinically validated Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale after six months of DBS.
Secondary outcomes are: disease related daily functioning, adverse effects, operation time, quality of life, patient satisfaction with treatment outcome and patient evaluation of treatment burden.
Study design: The study will be a multicentre prospective randomized open label blinded (PROBE) endpoint trial comparing thalamic DBS under general versus local anesthesia.
Study population: A total of 110 patients with disabling essential tremor despite optimal pharmacological treatment will be randomized.
Intervention (if applicable): Patients will be randomized for asleep DBS or awake DBS. According to the standard DBS procedure, two brain-electrodes are connected to an implanted neurostimulator, which is placed subcutaneously in the subclavicular area
Main study parameter/endpoints: The primary outcome measure is the change in tremor score on the Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale after 6 months of thalamic DBS.
The secondary outcome measures are the Amsterdam Linear Disability Score for functional health status, Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire, patient satisfaction with the treatment, patient evaluation of treatment burden, operating time, hospitalization time, change of tremor medication, side effects and complications.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Awake DBS at present is very burdensome and by many patients and health care providers considered to be an overly invasive treatment for essential tremor. Through this trial, we aim to investigate whether asleep DBS in essential tremor can become the new treatment standard. This is expected to increase the accessibility for DBS and subsequently would allow more people with essential tremor to be helped, as well as in an earlier stage of their disease than currently; more patients will benefit for a longer time period from DBS. Asleep DBS will have a shorter procedure length. The proposed research project involves treatment options that are standard care in daily practice. The therapies will not be combined with other research products. Both treatments have a low risk of serious complications and a higher risk of minor side effects. Regular follow up will be used. Participation in this study constitutes moderate risk according to NFU criteria for human research.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Age > 18 years;
Idiopathic essential tremor
Disabling tremor despite optimal pharmacological treatment
A life expectancy of at least two years
Disqualifiers
Legally incompetent adults;
Previous tremor-neurosurgery (e.g., DBS, thalamotomy);
Contraindications for DBS surgery, such as a physical disorder making surgery hazardous;
Psychosis;
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Awake DBS
Procedure/Surgery55 patients receive awake DBS (current standard procedure)
Asleep DBS
Procedure/Surgery55 patients receive asleep DBS
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS)
The amount of decrease in motor symptoms indicated by change in the disease-specific Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS) after six months of deep brain stimulation. The TETRAS scores are between 0 and 64; higher scores indicating worse (more severe) tremor symptoms.
Secondary outcomes
The Amsterdam Linear Disability Score for functional health status
The Amsterdam Linear Disability Score (ALDS) is a generic itembank which measures disability, as expressed by the ability to perform activities of daily living. These scores are linearly transformed into values between 0 and 100. Lower scores indicate more disability.
Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire
The Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) is a 30-item scale developed specifically for patients with essential tremor to measure items impacting perceived quality of life (QOL) that generic QOL measures do not effectively capture, including activities of daily living that are affected by essential tremor. The QUEST was made to be relatively brief and easy for patients to use.
Global Impression of Change
The CGI provides an overall clinician-determined summary measure that takes into account all available information, including a knowledge of the patient's history, psychosocial circumstances, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on the patient's ability to function. The CGI actually comprises two companion one-item measures evaluating the following: (a) severity of psychopathology from 1 to 7 and (b) change from the initiation of treatment on a similar seven-point scale.
EQ-5D-5L
The EQ-5D-5L consists of 2 pages: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can imagine' and 'The worst health you can imagine'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflect the patient's own judgement.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Lead sponsor
University Medical Center Groningen
Collaborator
Medical Center Haaglanden
Collaborator
The Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital
Collaborator
Maastricht University Medical Center
Collaborator
Radboud University Medical Center
Collaborator
Medisch Spectrum Twente
Collaborator