About this trial
This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of nasal continuous positive airway pressure versus high-flow nasal cannula as initial non-invasive respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
- Preterm infants with gestational age 28 to 36 weeks and 6 days
Clinical diagnosis of respiratory distress syndrome
Spontaneous breathing without immediate need for invasive mechanical ventilation
Requirement for non-invasive respiratory support
Disqualifiers
- Infants requiring immediate endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation
Major congenital anomalies affecting the respiratory or cardiovascular systems
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia
Significant congenital heart disease
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Non-invasive respiratory support
DeviceNon-invasive respiratory support using either nCPAP or high-flow nasal cannula according to group allocation.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Treatment failure within 72 hours
Number of infants meeting predefined criteria for treatment failure of the assigned non-invasive respiratory support modality within the first 72 hours.
Secondary outcomes
Need for mechanical ventilation
Number of infants requiring endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation.
Need for surfactant therapy
Number of infants requiring surfactant administration.
Duration of respiratory support
Mean duration of non-invasive respiratory support in days.
Incidence of nasal trauma
Number of infants who develop nasal trauma related to the respiratory support interface.
Locations
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: