Neural Mechanisms of Light Driven Analgesia

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

About this trial

The goal of this study will be to understand the biological mechanisms that are responsible to light-driven analgesia. Light presented to the retina has been shown to have pain relieving properties in pre-clinical and clinical studies. In this study the investigators will evaluate the functional connectivity between subcortical visual areas and non-image forming brain areas that are involved in pain sensation. The investigators will also evaluate how three colored light stimuli presented to the retina results in changes in whole brain evoked activation patterns in participants with chronic musculoskeletal pain and in healthy controls. The investigators will also assess while brain evoked activation patterns in response to a pressure pain stimulus in the presence of three light stimuli in individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain and healthy controls.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Adults ≥18 years of age.

Individuals who do not have any plans for medication or treatment changes for the next 3 months.

Participants must be willing and able to undergo an MRI.

Participants must not be claustrophobic

Disqualifiers

Presence of retinal vision disorders or conditions resulting in vision impairment.

Patient-reported photosensitivity, photophobia, or aversion (as may occur in autoimmune diseases such as systematic lupus erythematosus).

Disorders including uveitis, cataracts, color-blindness, history of seizure disorder.

Plans for analgesic treatment plan changes in next 3 months (surgery, analgesic medication changes, injections, pain procedures, etc).

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • S-cone modulating visual stimulus

    Other intervention

    The investigators will deliver a uniform wide-field, S-cone modulating stimulus via a fiberoptic, MRI-safe visual stimulator. This stimulus approximates the appearance of white but modulates the S-cone, driving the S-ON and S-OFF pathways by alternating two lights at 19 Hz using a mixture of light emitting diodes (LEDs), including those embedded in our stimulus with spectral peaks of 405, 565, and 660 nm. This stimulus will differentially activate the S-cones where, between the two phases the ratio of S-cone activity is 100. The frequency alternating between the two lights, 19 Hz, was chosen because retinal ganglion cells in the retina still respond robustly but above the cortical perceptual flicker detection threshold.

  • Equal Energy White Visual Stimulus

    Other intervention

    The investigators will deliver a uniform wide-field, equal-energy light stimulus via a fiberoptic, MRI-safe visual stimulator. This will serve as a reference condition in which chromatic opponency has been eliminated. This stimulus ensures that the quantal catch of each cone photoreceptor (S-, M- and L-) is held constant using a mixture of LEDs, including those embedded in our stimulus with spectral peaks of 405, 565, and 660 nm. The stimulus will modulate to nearly approximate the appearance of the S-cone modulating light.

  • Green light visual stimulus (S-OFF)

    Other intervention

    The investigators will deliver a uniform wide-field, green light modulating stimulus via a fiberoptic, MRI-safe visual stimulator. Static Green (565 nm) Light presented via MRI compatible light guides.

  • Evoked Pressure Pain Stimulus

    Other intervention

    The pressure in which a rapid inflation cuff positioned over the left gastrocnemius achieves a pain severity of 40 where 0 is "no pain" and 100 is the "worst pain imaginable will be determined pre-scan and applied during the entire functional imaging acquisition to evoke a deep pressure pain.

Treatment groups

60 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Light sequence during imagingExperimental treatment 4 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Resting State Functional Connectivity-seed Voxel Analysis in Participants with cMSP and Healthy Controls

Functional connectivity assessed under three lighting conditions will be assessed with a seed voxel analysis with the seed region of interest set as the pregeniculate nucleus. A map of connectivity will be generated and displayed over inflated brain space. This map will be constructed by calculating the Fisher-transformed correlation coefficients between each voxel with the BOLD times series for the Pregeniculate nucleus. The higher the correlation coefficient, the stronger connectivity of each voxel to the pregeniculate. The correlation coefficient will be plotted as an map.

Time frame
During 8 minute resting state scan as part of the ~1 hour scanning session
2

Whole Brain Evoked Activation Patterns in Response to Chromatic Stimuli Contrasted with Achromatic Stimuli in Participants with cMSP and Healthy Controls

A generalized linear model (GLM) using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) version 12 will be constructed. Blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) activation signal time series collected under the dynamic S-cone modulating stimulus condition will be contrasted to those collected during the equal energy stimulus condition. SPM will be used to create a contrast vector between the two conditions and a T-map will be created where the T-statistic for the contrast at each voxel will be plotted. The larger the t-statistic for each voxel the larger the contrast between the two light conditions.

Time frame
During 6 minute functional imaging scan within the ~1 hour scanning protocol
3

Whole Brain Evoked Activation Patterns in Response to Chromatic Stimuli Contrasted with Achromatic Stimuli in Patients with cMSP and Healthy Controls Exposed to a Pressure Pain Stimulus

A generalized linear model (GLM) using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) version 12 will be constructed. Blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) activation signal time series collected under the dynamic S-cone modulating stimulus condition will be contrasted to those collected during the equal energy stimulus condition in context of an evoked pressure pain stimulus. SPM will be used to create a contrast vector between the two conditions and a T-map will be created where the T-statistic for the contrast at each voxel will be plotted. The larger the t-statistic for each voxel the larger the contrast between the two light conditions.

Time frame
During 6 minute functional imaging scan within the 1 hour scanning protocol

Secondary outcomes

1

Pressure Pain Threshold

Pressure Pain Threshold is the threshold in which pain is experienced in response to increasing force applied to the trapezius measured by a pressure algometer in kilograms of force per square centimeter (kgf/cm\^2). The higher the value, the higher the threshold. The maximum is 10 kgf/cm\^2 and minimum is 0.

Time frame
Within ~2 hours pre-scan
2

Temporal Summation

The investigators will evaluate temporal summation using a 40g Neuropen applied to the skin of the volar forearm and lumbar region, following a train of 10 identical stimuli (1 Hz). Participants will report retrospectively, the pain intensity of the 1st and 10th pinprick using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS). 0 is the minimum and 10 is the maximum pain intensity that will be reported.

Time frame
Within ~2 hours pre-scan
3

Conditioned Pain Modulation

Conditioned Pain modulation magnitude will be calculated as the difference in mean pressure pain threshold (kgf/cm\^2) measured prior to and during the conditioning stimulus (cold water bath), with increases in pressure pain threshold during conditioning interpreted as evidence of efficient endogenous pain inhibition.

Time frame
Within ~2 hours pre-scan

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

Collaborator